250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114604)
1. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
Glendon MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications.
Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The second time as tragedy: the assisted suicide cases and the heritage of Roe v. Wade.
Kreimer SF
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):863-901. PubMed ID: 11657286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Debate distant for many having abortions.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
Weeks AB
North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
Mangel CP
Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in The Netherlands: a report to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.
Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(3):301-24. PubMed ID: 9949646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
Riggs T
San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade.
Rice CF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rewriting Roe v. Wade.
Regan DH
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The women of Roe v. Wade.
Glendon MA
Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted suicide, the Supreme Court, and the constitutive function of the law.
Kaveny MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):29-34. PubMed ID: 9383665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
Stith R
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment.
Churchill LR; King NM
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7101):137-8. PubMed ID: 9251535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
