These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114604)
1. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate. Bopp J; Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A world without Roe: how different would it be? Glendon MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications. Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The second time as tragedy: the assisted suicide cases and the heritage of Roe v. Wade. Kreimer SF Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):863-901. PubMed ID: 11657286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Debate distant for many having abortions. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in The Netherlands: a report to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution. Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(3):301-24. PubMed ID: 9949646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications. Riggs T San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade. Rice CF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rewriting Roe v. Wade. Regan DH Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking Roe v. Wade. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted suicide, the Supreme Court, and the constitutive function of the law. Kaveny MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):29-34. PubMed ID: 9383665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade. Stith R William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment. Churchill LR; King NM BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7101):137-8. PubMed ID: 9251535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]