These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114608)
1. Oral arguments in Vacco v. Quill. No. 95-1858. Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):417-39. PubMed ID: 9114608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Oral arguments in Washington v. Glucksberg. No. 96-110. Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):393-416. PubMed ID: 9114607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Brief of the Attorney General in Vacco v. Quill in the United States Supreme Court. No. 95-1858. Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 9029844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal sedation: palliative care for intractable pain, post Glucksberg and Quill. McStay R Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 12953318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vacco v. Quill. Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 9479885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill. Pratt DA Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional analysis and physicians' rights after Vacco v. Quill. Palmer LI Cornell J Law Public Policy; 1998; 7(2):415-30. PubMed ID: 10342956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician assisted suicide. Quill v. Vacco. Finney LD Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 May; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10184586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not? Alpers A; Lo B JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. There's no right to assisted suicide. Annas GJ; Grodin MA N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term care: end-of-life issues. End-of-year issue brief. Miller KG Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2009 Jan; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 19297683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Choosing death: the ethics of assisted suicide. Verhey A Christ Century; 1996 Jul; 113(22):17-24. PubMed ID: 11654382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Brief of the Attorney General in Washington v. Glucksberg in the United States Supreme Court. No. 96-110. Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):295-321. PubMed ID: 9029843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On Kamisar, killing, and the future of physician-assisted death. Cantor NL Mich Law Rev; 2004 Aug; 102(8):1793-842. PubMed ID: 15637811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines. Kamisar Y Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'. Carolan B Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]