These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9116467)

  • 1. A new method for standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Kiliç AR; Efeoglu E; Yilmaz S
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1996; 18(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 9116467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for the geometric standardization of intraoral radiographs for long-term follow up of replanted teeth: a case report.
    Hamanaka EF; Poi WR; Salzedas LM; Alves LC; Panzarini SR; Sonoda CK; Martins CM
    Dent Traumatol; 2013 Apr; 29(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 22554390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fundamental study of alveolar bone measurements in the hamster using an apparatus for intraoral radiography].
    Segawa H
    Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Jul; 17(2):77-94. PubMed ID: 2132319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital image ratio: a new radiographic method for quantifying changes in alveolar bone. Part 1: Theory and methodology.
    Jean A; Epelboin Y; Rimsky A; Soyer A; Ouhayoun JP
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 8814585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
    J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of radiographic technique using a new customized film holder for dental implant assessment.
    Aparecida de Mattias Sartori I; da Silveira Junior CD; Fontão FN; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24384739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) of bone density in periradicular bone defects healing.
    Katanec D; Kobler P; Slaj M; Anić I; Milosak T
    Coll Antropol; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl():7-13. PubMed ID: 9951134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of photodensitometric with high-resolution digital analysis of bone density from serial dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes A; Pun T; Cimasoni G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1397451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21488967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography.
    Sander L; Wenzel A; Hintze H; Karring T
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1288-91. PubMed ID: 8997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Carpio L; Christersson LA; Clerehugh V
    J Periodontol; 1992 Aug; 63(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 1507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.