These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9116970)

  • 21. Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch.
    Alt EU; Fotuhi PC; Callihan RL; Rollins DL; Mestre E; Combs MP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 7805249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the addition of an abdominal hot can cardioverter/defibrillator pulse generator on the defibrillation energy requirements in a single-lead endocardial defibrillation system.
    Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Strasser R; Schlepper M; Pitschner H
    Eur Heart J; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 9347278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective randomized cross-over comparison of mono- and biphasic defibrillation using nonthoracotomy lead configurations in humans.
    Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Wietholt D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 5(7):581-90. PubMed ID: 7987528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lidocaine's effect on defibrillation threshold are dependent on the defibrillation electrode system: epicardial versus endocardial.
    Winecoff Miller AP; Sims JJ; McSwain R; Ujhelyi MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 9554736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Wyse DG; Kavanagh KM; Gillis AM; Mitchell LB; Duff HJ; Sheldon RS; Kieser TM; Maitland A; Flanagan P; Rothschild J
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 8421983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preliminary experience with a hybrid nonthoracotomy defibrillating system that includes a biphasic device: comparison with a standard monophasic device using the same lead system.
    Natale A; Sra J; Axtell K; Maglio C; Dhala A; Deshpande S; Jazayeri M; Wase A; Akhtar M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Aug; 24(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 8034875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs.
    Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN; Hoffmann RG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 12(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 3403834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. First experience with a new nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system.
    Trappe HJ; Pfitzner P; Wenzlaff P; Fain E; Fieguth HG
    Am Heart J; 1996 Sep; 132(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 8800031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Bardy GH; Troutman C; Johnson G; Mehra R; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Gartman DM
    Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 1860210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical efficacy and safety of atrial defibrillation using biphasic shocks and current nonthoracotomy endocardial lead configurations.
    Saksena S; Prakash A; Mangeon L; Varanasi S; Kolettis T; Mathew P; De Groot P; Mehra R; Krol RB
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 76(12):913-21. PubMed ID: 7484831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elevated defibrillation threshold when right-sided venous access is used for nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead implantation. The Endotak Investigators.
    Epstein AE; Kay GN; Plumb VJ; Voshage-Stahl L; Hull ML
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 6(11):979-86. PubMed ID: 8589875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of simultaneous versus sequential defibrillation pulsing techniques using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Hsia HH; Kleiman RB; Flores BT; Marchlinski FE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 17(7):1222-30. PubMed ID: 7937228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of myocardial infarction on catheter defibrillation threshold.
    Babbs CF; Paris RL; Tacker WA; Bourland JD
    Med Instrum; 1983; 17(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 6843409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
    Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous mesh and plate electrodes for nonthoracotomy canine defibrillation.
    Nogami A; Takahashi A; Nitta J; Aonuma K; Iesaka Y; Hiroe M; Marumo F; Hiraoka M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Sep; 14(9):1402-10. PubMed ID: 1720534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endocardial carbon-braid electrodes. A new concept for lower defibrillation thresholds.
    Alt EU; Fotuhi PC; Callihan RL; Mestre E; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1627-33. PubMed ID: 7664450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation energy in dogs using bidirectional pulse discharges.
    Echt DS; Barbey JT; Black JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Sep; 11(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 2460837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.