364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9117367)
1. The court's effectiveness in protecting the rights of juveniles in delinquency cases.
Ainsworth JE
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):64-74. PubMed ID: 9117367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The juvenile court and delinquency cases.
Snyder HN
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):53-63. PubMed ID: 9117366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The juvenile court: a view from the bench.
Mitchell DB
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 9117358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juvenile crime and criminal justice: resolving border disputes.
Fagan J
Future Child; 2008; 18(2):81-118. PubMed ID: 21337999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The nature of the court today.
Rubin HT
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):40-52. PubMed ID: 9117365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The implications of Articles 37 and 40 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child for U.S. juvenile justice and U.S. ratification of the convention.
Mlyniec WJ
Child Welfare; 2010; 89(5):103-20. PubMed ID: 21361160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The early history of the court.
Fox SJ
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):29-39. PubMed ID: 9117363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The juvenile court: analysis and recommendations.
Stevenson CS; Larson CS; Carter LS; Gomby DS; Terman DL; Behrman RE
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):4-28. PubMed ID: 9117364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents' criminal culpability.
Steinberg L
Nat Rev Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 23756633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliminating the Competency Presumption in Juvenile Delinquency Cases.
Katner DR
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 24(3):403-50. PubMed ID: 26809160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denial of the child's right to counsel, voice, and participation in juvenile delinquency proceedings.
Henning K
Child Welfare; 2010; 89(5):121-38. PubMed ID: 21361161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of the juvenile court: a theoretical framework that fits.
Moore MH
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 9117360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
Siegel DM
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Term-of-Years Sentences Since
Piel JL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Mar; 48(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31980456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying Roper v. Simmons in juvenile transfer and waiver proceedings: a legal and neuroscientific inquiry.
Fabian JM
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Aug; 55(5):732-55. PubMed ID: 20525819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Status offenses.
Steinhart DJ
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):86-99. PubMed ID: 9117369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leaving the family out of family court: criminalizing the juvenile justice system.
Snyder PR; Martin LH
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1978 Jul; 48(3):390-393. PubMed ID: 677273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fifty delinquents in juvenile and adult court.
Beyer M
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2006 Apr; 76(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 16719640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responding to juvenile crime: lessons learned.
Greenwood PW
Future Child; 1996; 6(3):75-85. PubMed ID: 9117368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eye on Washington: legislation and advocacy to reform juvenile justice.
Raphel S
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2011 May; 24(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 21501291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
