These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9117763)

  • 1. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision and Fuji Super HR-S panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kitagawa H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 9720103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometric and image analysis of T-grain film.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Aug; 62(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 3462620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information yield: a comparison of Kodak T-Mat G, Ortho L and RP X-Omat films.
    Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2599233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Will the new highly intensifying film-screen combination of the Kodak T-MAT G/Lanex Regular meet the qualitative requirements of the lateral teleroentgenogram and orthopantomogram?].
    Schulz D; Bührmann K; Plein-Jakobs E; Jakobs W
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Jun; 49(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 3165364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.