These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9119600)

  • 1. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the high risk register and auditory brainstem response.
    Friedland DR; Fahs MC; Catalano PJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1996 Dec; 38(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 9119600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Universal newborn hearing screenings: a three-year experience.
    Barsky-Firkser L; Sun S
    Pediatrics; 1997 Jun; 99(6):E4. PubMed ID: 9164800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
    Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
    Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 2002 Jan; 109(1):E7. PubMed ID: 11773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
    Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.
    Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives?
    Connolly JL; Carron JD; Roark SD
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Feb; 115(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 15689741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Neonatal Hearing Screening.
    Levit Y; Himmelfarb M; Dollberg S
    Pediatrics; 2015 Sep; 136(3):e641-7. PubMed ID: 26324873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ABR hearing screening for high-risk infants.
    Van Riper LA; Kileny PR
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 10431896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.
    Keren R; Helfand M; Homer C; McPhillips H; Lieu TA
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 12415021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costs of different strategies for neonatal hearing screening: a modelling approach.
    Boshuizen HC; van der Lem GJ; Kauffman-de Boer MA; van Zanten GA; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Verkerk PH
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2001 Nov; 85(3):F177-81. PubMed ID: 11668159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant hearing screening with an automated auditory brainstem response screener and the auditory brainstem response.
    Chen SJ; Yang EY; Kwan ML; Chang P; Shiao AS; Lien CF
    Acta Paediatr; 1996 Jan; 85(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8834973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of audiological results of patients referred from newborn hearing screening program.
    Song CI; Kang HS; Ahn JH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(11):1113-8. PubMed ID: 26144243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The economics of screening infants at risk of hearing impairment: an international analysis.
    Burke MJ; Shenton RC; Taylor MJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 22129917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of neonatal hearing screening program with two-stage transient otoacoustic emissions in Turkey.
    Tatli MM; Bulent Serbetcioglu M; Duman N; Kumral A; Kirkim G; Ogun B; Ozkan H
    Pediatr Int; 2007 Apr; 49(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 17445032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing loss screening in the neonatal intensive care unit: auditory brain stem response versus Crib-O-Gram; a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Prager DA; Stone DA; Rose DN
    Ear Hear; 1987 Aug; 8(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 3115854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.