These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 911968)

  • 1. Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.
    Crump KS; Guess HA; Deal KL
    Biometrics; 1977 Sep; 33(3):437-51. PubMed ID: 911968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dose-response model incorporating nonlinear kinetics.
    Van Ryzin J; Rai K
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 3567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating additional biological phenomena into two-stage cancer models.
    Sielken RL; Bretzlaff RS; Stevenson DE
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 387():237-60. PubMed ID: 7972250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of cancer slope factors using different statistical approaches.
    Subramaniam RP; White P; Cogliano VJ
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 16834636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear interpolation algorithm for low dose risk assessment of toxic substances.
    Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980 Nov; 4(5-6):305-12. PubMed ID: 7217854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved procedure for low-dose carcinogenic risk assessment from animal data.
    Crump KS
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1984 Jul; 5(4-5):339-48. PubMed ID: 6520736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A statistical test of compatibility of data sets to a common dose-response model.
    Stiteler WM; Knauf LA; Hertzberg RC; Schoeny RS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 8128001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose response problems in carcinogenesis.
    Crump KS
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 497333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
    Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assessment of low-dose carcinogenicity.
    Armitage P
    Biometrics; 1982 Mar; 38 Suppl():119-39. PubMed ID: 7046818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal design of the chronic animal bioassay.
    Portier C; Hoel D
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1983 Jul; 12(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 6631999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose-rate extrapolation using the multistage model.
    Portier C; Hoel D
    Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 6671125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.
    Crump KS; Hoel DG; Langley CH; Peto R
    Cancer Res; 1976 Sep; 36(9 pt.1):2973-9. PubMed ID: 975067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.
    Shipp A; Lawrence G; Gentry R; McDonald T; Bartow H; Bounds J; Macdonald N; Clewell H; Allen B; Van Landingham C
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006; 36(6-7):481-608. PubMed ID: 16973444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
    Vainio H; Hemminki K
    J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 8241374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate bioassay.
    Vølund A
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6996751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some practical problems arising from use of the gamma multihit model for risk estimation.
    Haseman JK; Hoel DG; Jennrich RI
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1981 Sep; 8(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 6808148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.