These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9119756)

  • 1. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear.
    Williams DM; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):127-46. PubMed ID: 9119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral and ipsilateral suppression of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in human subjects.
    Williams DM; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 7876435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Chang KW; Norton SJ
    Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 8817301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss in a clinical population.
    Lind O
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10572971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA; Carlyon RP; Williams DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3291-7. PubMed ID: 8326057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of non-linear cochlear mechanics in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica: ancestral and modern mammalian features.
    Faulstich M; Kössl M; Reimer K
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):47-53. PubMed ID: 8789810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.