BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9120192)

  • 1. Profitability and acceptability of fat- and sodium-modified hot entrees in a worksite cafeteria.
    Perlmutter CA; Canter DD; Gregoire MB
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1997 Apr; 97(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 9120192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A healthful options food station can improve satisfaction and generate gross profit in a worksite cafeteria.
    Kimathi AN; Gregoire MB; Dowling RA; Stone MK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 May; 109(5):914-7. PubMed ID: 19394481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing frequency of lower-fat entrees offered at school lunch: an environmental change strategy to increase healthful selections.
    Bartholomew JB; Jowers EM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Feb; 106(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 16442873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of children selecting low-fat foods in an elementary school lunch program.
    Whitaker RC; Wright JA; Koepsell TD; Finch AJ; Psaty BM
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1994 Oct; 148(10):1085-91. PubMed ID: 7921101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer acceptance of foods lower in sodium.
    Adams SO; Maller O; Cardello AV
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Apr; 95(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 7699187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing fat and sodium in school lunch programs: the LUNCHPOWER! Intervention Study.
    Snyder MP; Story M; Trenkner LL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1992 Sep; 92(9):1087-91. PubMed ID: 1512366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soy-enhanced lunch acceptance by preschoolers.
    Endres J; Barter S; Theodora P; Welch P
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Mar; 103(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 12616257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced-portion entrĂ©es in a worksite and restaurant setting: impact on food consumption and waste.
    Berkowitz S; Marquart L; Mykerezi E; Degeneffe D; Reicks M
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Nov; 19(16):3048-3054. PubMed ID: 27256403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nutrition promotion in a university foodservice: reduced fat, sodium, and energy content of menus.
    Kubena KS; Carson DE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1988 Nov; 88(11):1412-6. PubMed ID: 3183261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a grill menu redesign influence sales, nutrients purchased, and consumer acceptance in a worksite cafeteria?
    Vadiveloo MK; Malik VS; Spiegelman D; Willett WC; Mattei J
    Prev Med Rep; 2017 Dec; 8():140-147. PubMed ID: 29034148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does point-of-purchase nutrition labeling influence meal selections? A test in an Army cafeteria.
    Sproul AD; Canter DD; Schmidt JB
    Mil Med; 2003 Jul; 168(7):556-60. PubMed ID: 12901467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diet high in monounsaturated fat does not have a different effect on arterial elasticity than a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet.
    Ashton EL; Pomeroy S; Foster JE; Kaye RS; Nestel PJ; Ball M
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 May; 100(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 10812378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meals offered and served in US public schools: do they meet nutrient standards?
    Crepinsek MK; Gordon AR; McKinney PM; Condon EM; Wilson A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S31-43. PubMed ID: 19166671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energy, saturated fat, and sodium were lower in entrĂ©es at chain restaurants at 18 months compared with 6 months following the implementation of mandatory menu labeling regulation in King County, Washington.
    Bruemmer B; Krieger J; Saelens BE; Chan N
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Aug; 112(8):1169-76. PubMed ID: 22704898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ad libitum, very low-fat diet results in weight loss and changes in nutrient intakes in postmenopausal women.
    Mueller-Cunningham WM; Quintana R; Kasim-Karakas SE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Dec; 103(12):1600-6. PubMed ID: 14647085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Promoting low-fat entree choices in a public cafeteria.
    Mayer JA; Heins JM; Vogel JM; Morrison DC; Lankester LD; Jacobs AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1986; 19(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 2433261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A pricing strategy to promote sales of lower fat foods in high school cafeterias: acceptability and sensitivity analysis.
    Hannan P; French SA; Story M; Fulkerson JA
    Am J Health Promot; 2002; 17(1):1-6, ii. PubMed ID: 12271753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An environmental intervention to reduce dietary fat in school lunches.
    Whitaker RC; Wright JA; Finch AJ; Psaty BM
    Pediatrics; 1993 Jun; 91(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 8502510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. School lunch menus and 11 to 12 year old children's food choice in three secondary schools in England-are the nutritional standards being met?
    Gould R; Russell J; Barker ME
    Appetite; 2006 Jan; 46(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16298457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soy protein lowers fat and saturated fat in school lunch beef and pork entrees.
    Thomas JM; Lutz SF
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Apr; 101(4):461-3. PubMed ID: 11320954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.