BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9120609)

  • 1. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?
    Mackert JR; Wahl MJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 15468542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
    Lowe E; Rego NA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior restorative materials research.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):73-6. PubMed ID: 9120616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Suasha P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Amalgam. X. Glass-ionomer cement: a biocompatible substitute for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Nov; 100(11):484-8. PubMed ID: 11822129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB; Neme AM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):218-28. PubMed ID: 9863442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of tissue reaction to some denture-base materials: an animal study.
    Ebadian B; Razavi M; Soleimanpour S; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):67-74. PubMed ID: 18473029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Future directions in bonding resins to the dentine-pulp complex.
    Bouillaguet S; Wataha JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 15089947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.