These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9120609)

  • 21. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dental materials: 1995 literature review.
    Lloyd CH; Scrimgeour SN; Brown D; Clarke RL; Curtis RV; Hatton PV; Ireland AJ; McCabe JF; Nicholson JW; Setcos JC; Sherriff M; van Noort R; Watts DC; Whitters CJ; Wood D
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):173-208. PubMed ID: 9175346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Esthetic restoration of the posterior sector. State of the art].
    Prati C; Tiozzi E; Giommoni E
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Nov-15; 58(17):72-6, 79-85. PubMed ID: 2289593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of elevated temperatures on various restorative materials: an in vitro study.
    Bose RS; Mohan B; Lakshminarayanan L
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 16372794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.
    Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [6 dentin adhesive products subjected to controls in vitro].
    Neroni M; Regad C; Christen O; Thoenen S; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1990 Dec; 18(4):271-85. PubMed ID: 1965650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Some principles in the selection and use of some tooth-coloured materials and techniques--1998.
    Bryant R
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1998 Oct; 14():86-93. PubMed ID: 10895618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biological compatibility of prosthodontic materials.
    Campbell SD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16 Suppl():52-4; discussion 68-70. PubMed ID: 14661710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of Crest Night Effects bleaching gel on dental enamel, dentin and key restorative materials. In vitro studies.
    White DJ; Kozak KM; Zoladz JR; Duschner HJ; Goetz H
    Am J Dent; 2003 Nov; 16 Spec No():22B-27B. PubMed ID: 15055984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dental materials: 1994 literature review.
    Brown D; Clarke RL; Curtis RV; Hatton PV; Ireland AJ; McCabe JF; Nicholson JW; Setcos JC; Sherriff M; Strang R; Van Noort R; Watts DC; Wood D
    J Dent; 1996 May; 24(3):153-84. PubMed ID: 8675789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials.
    Schmalz G
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 2):696-706. PubMed ID: 9584903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Restorative materials.
    Holmstrom SE
    J Vet Dent; 1991 Mar; 8(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 1930734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.