BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9120616)

  • 1. Posterior restorative materials research.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):73-6. PubMed ID: 9120616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical considerations concerning glass ionomer cements used for basing amalgam restorations.
    O'Hara JW; McManus DB
    Compendium; 1990 Mar; 11(3):130, 132, 134-6. PubMed ID: 2376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of posterior composite resins and extending their use with glass ionomer cements.
    McLean JW
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Aug; 18(8):517-29. PubMed ID: 3507719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternatives to amalgam.
    Lyons K
    N Z Dent J; 1997 Jun; 93(412):47-50. PubMed ID: 9293745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
    Lowe E; Rego NA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The bifunctional posterior restoration.
    Kanca J
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Sep; 19(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 3269610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature.
    Burgess JO; Walker R; Davidson JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 12412962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The controlled placement and delayed polymerization technique for the direct Class 2 posterior composite restoration.
    Atlas AM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Nov; 26(11):812-8, 820-2. PubMed ID: 16300237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of a posterior composite resin lined with glass ionomer.
    Garcia-Godoy F
    Gen Dent; 1988; 36(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 3271735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the future of amalgam?
    Hume R; Bayne SC; Duke ES; Roulet JF; Zimmer S; Lösche G; Noack M
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9063225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.