These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The availability of attentional resources modulates the inhibitory strength related to weakly activated priming. Wang Y; Wang Y; Liu P; Dai D; Di M; Chen Q Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1655-64. PubMed ID: 27198916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Negative priming and perceptual fluency: more than what meets the eye. Grison S; Strayer DL Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 11578050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distractor inhibition: principles of operation during selective attention. Wyatt N; Machado L J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):245-56. PubMed ID: 22506783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions]. Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional inhibition in patients with focal frontal lobe lesions. McDonald CR; Bauer RM; Filoteo JV; Grande L; Roper SN; Gilmore R J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 27(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 15962693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibitory mechanisms of attention: locus, stability, and relationship with distractor interference effects. Tipper SP; Weaver B; Kirkpatrick J; Lewis S Br J Psychol; 1991 Nov; 82 ( Pt 4)():507-20. PubMed ID: 1782519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the decay of distractor-response episodes. Frings C Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Buckolz E; Goldfarb A; Khan M Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):837-45. PubMed ID: 15495908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism. Frings C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Park J; Kanwisher N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):613-23. PubMed ID: 8027715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Guy S; Buckolz E; Pratt J Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 14959501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Baroreceptor activity impacts upon controlled but not automatic distractor processing. Pramme L; Schächinger H; Frings C Biol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 110():75-84. PubMed ID: 26134892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saccades curve away from previously inhibited locations: evidence for the role of priming in oculomotor competition. Belopolsky AV; Van der Stigchel S J Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 110(10):2370-7. PubMed ID: 23986563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]