These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9121982)

  • 1. Does an SVC electrode further reduce DFT in a hot-can ICD system?
    Mouchawar GA; Wolsleger WK; Doan PD; Causey JD; Kroll MW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9121982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the superior vena cava electrode surface area on defibrillation threshold in different lead systems.
    Tomassoni G; Newby K; Moredock L; Rembert J; Natale A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9474653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of malpositioned transvenous leads on defibrillation efficacy with and without a subcutaneous array electrode.
    Usui M; Walcott GP; KenKnight BH; Walker RG; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2008-16. PubMed ID: 8552514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single capacitive discharge utilizing an auxiliary shock in the coronary venous system reduces the defibrillation threshold.
    Roberts PR; Zhang Y; Zhuan S; Mowrey KA; Wallick DW; Hills DG; Betts TR; Allen S; Ewert J; Mazgalev TN; Morgan JM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 5(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 11752919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of biphasic shock duration on defibrillation threshold with different electrode configurations and phase 2 capacitances: prediction by upper-limit-of-vulnerability determination.
    Schauerte PN; Ziegert K; Waldmann M; Schöndube FA; Birkenhauer F; Mischke K; Grossmann M; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
    Circulation; 1999 Mar; 99(11):1516-22. PubMed ID: 10086978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Heil JE; Jones J; Lang DJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 9121980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of a middle cardiac vein defibrillation coil as stand-alone anode, auxiliary anode, and bystander electrode in a transvenous defibrillation circuit.
    Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Allen S; Roberts PR; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 27(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15305957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biventricular shocking leads improve defibrillation efficacy.
    Yamanouchi Y; Efimov IR; Mowrey KA; Mazgalev TN; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):561-5. PubMed ID: 10355698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation.
    Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
    Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implantable intravascular defibrillator: evaluation of defibrillation waveforms with inferior vena cava electrode system.
    Sanders WE; Malkin RA; Richey MW; Masson SC; Ransbury TJ; Urtz MW; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 May; 34(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 21208244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of coronary sinus electrode on the optimal atrial defibrillation pathway for an atrioventricular defibrillator.
    Tse HF; Timmermans C; Rodriguez LM; Lau CP; Wellens HJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12625607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared to conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a canine model.
    Sanders WE; Richey MW; Malkin RA; Masson SC; Ransbury TJ; Urtz MW; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Feb; 8(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 21034853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system.
    Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.