BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9122457)

  • 1. [Digital radiology in dentistry: experience with direct intraoral techniques (radiovideography)].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Dec; 92(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 9122457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Digital panoramic radiography in patients with rigid internal fixations devices after maxillofacial surgery].
    Nessi R; Ottolina P; Lazzerini F; Giannì AB
    Radiol Med; 1998; 95(1-2):25-31. PubMed ID: 9636723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison between endoral radiography and electronic magnification of digital orthopantomography].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7501826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoral or panoramic radiography?
    Bean LR; Akerman WY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Jan; 28(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 6584346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography: update for oral health care workers.
    Noffke CE; Nzima N; Chabikuli NJ
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):293-5. PubMed ID: 15537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiological assessment of periapical status using the periapical index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiography.
    Ridao-Sacie C; Segura-Egea JJ; Fernández-Palacín A; Bullón-Fernández P; Ríos-Santos JV
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17451455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of periapical status: a comparative study using film-based periapical radiographs and digital panoramic images.
    Ríos-Santos JV; Ridao-Sacie C; Bullón P; Fernández-Palacín A; Segura-Egea JJ
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Nov; 15(6):e952-6. PubMed ID: 20711112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography and ultrasonography in detecting periapical lesions using periapical radiography as a gold standard.
    Arslan ZB; Demir H; Berker Yıldız D; Yaşar F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190290. PubMed ID: 32453610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
    Forner Navarro L; Llena Puy MC; García Godoy F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.
    Raghav N; Reddy SS; Giridhar AG; Murthy S; Yashodha Devi BK; Santana N; Rakesh N; Kaushik A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 20727498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of radiographic requirements and techniques.
    Farman AG; Shawkat AH
    J Dent Educ; 1981 Sep; 45(9):581-4. PubMed ID: 6943176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions.
    Sullivan JE; Di Fiore PM; Koerber A
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 11194362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.