These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9122460)

  • 1. [Use of a digital radiology system with phosphors in the assessment of thoracic diseases in bedside radiography].
    Cuscianna G; Saguatti G; Serafini M; Baldari F; Ferrari G; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 1996 Dec; 92(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 9122460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andersson B; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Pettersson H
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 2698744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system.
    Hillen W; Schiebel U; Zaengel T
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 3683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Digital radiography of the chest in pediatric patients].
    Puig S
    Radiologe; 2003 Dec; 43(12):1045-50. PubMed ID: 14668992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene RE; Oestmann JW; Kamalsky JM; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; Robertson CL; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F; Smathers RL
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of daily bedside chest radiography as visualized by digital luminescence radiography.
    Kirchner J; Stueckle CA; Schilling EM; Peters J
    Australas Radiol; 2001 Nov; 45(4):444-7. PubMed ID: 11903176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New techniques in chest radiography.
    Glazer HS; Muka E; Sagel SS; Jost RG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.