These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9122674)

  • 21. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: yes.
    Kopans DB
    Important Adv Oncol; 1995; ():231-41. PubMed ID: 7672809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Miller AB
    Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2164; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program.
    Rodger A; Kavanagh AM
    Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The benefit of a population based mammography screening--scientifically proven or not?].
    Stronegger WJ; Rásky E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Oct; 128(44):2329-30. PubMed ID: 14593578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response to Kopans.
    Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective.
    Wright CJ; Mueller CB
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8966):29-32. PubMed ID: 7603143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comment on the Elwood Paper.
    Kopans DB
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 42():[1687 words; 8 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8117361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A different view on what is known about breast screening and the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Baines CJ
    Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1207-11. PubMed ID: 8055439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of estrogen on screening mammography: another complexity.
    Black WC; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):627-8. PubMed ID: 8627634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. European Society of Mastology Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer screening, Paris, 4-5 February 1993: report of the Evaluation Committee.
    Wald NJ; Chamberlain J; Hackshaw A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1994; 6(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 7986765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
    Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rejoinder to Elwood's reply.
    Kopans DB
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 47():[1069 words; 5 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Good reasons for mammography screening. About misunderstood criticism of underlying investigations!].
    Garne JP; Hessov I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jul; 162(31):4165-7. PubMed ID: 10962925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case for.
    Warren R
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):969-70. PubMed ID: 3142571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Schematization and forcing of the analysis of mammographic screening effectiveness].
    Liberati A
    Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 12125384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Csaba D; Budai A; Ember I
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Sep; 146(38):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16238249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammographic screening.
    Beral V
    Lancet; 1993 Jun; 341(8859):1509-10. PubMed ID: 8099384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against.
    Skrabanek P
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):971-2. PubMed ID: 3142572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Re: International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.
    Onysko J; Bancej CM; Pim CP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):238; author reply 238-9. PubMed ID: 14759996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Novel data on mammography: invitation to organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality].
    Schulz-Wendtland R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):52. PubMed ID: 11977394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.