These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9122778)

  • 21. Do we need a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage to increase the stability of functional spinal unit when comparing unilateral and bilateral fixation?
    Ulutaş M; Özkaya M; Yaman O; Demir T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Jul; 232(7):655-664. PubMed ID: 29923451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study.
    Du L; Sun XJ; Zhou TJ; Li YC; Chen C; Zhao CQ; Zhang K; Zhao J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29162074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
    Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical analysis of anterior scoliosis instrumentation: differences between single and dual rod systems with and without interbody structural support.
    Fricka KB; Mahar AT; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):702-6. PubMed ID: 11923662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion: threaded devices alone versus vertical cages plus posterior instrumentation.
    Klemme WR; Owens BD; Dhawan A; Zeidman S; Polly DW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 11317974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques.
    Cain CM; Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2631-6. PubMed ID: 16319749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.
    Goh JC; Wong HK; Thambyah A; Yu CS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(1):35-9; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 10647158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation.
    An HS; Lim TH; You JW; Hong JH; Eck J; McGrady L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):1979-83. PubMed ID: 8578371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density.
    Lund T; Oxland TR; Jost B; Cripton P; Grassmann S; Etter C; Nolte LP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Mar; 80(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 9546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical comparison of supplemental posterior fixations for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang M; Tang SJ; McGrady LM; Rao RD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 23662340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation.
    Glazer PA; Colliou O; Lotz JC; Bradford DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(10):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8727196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; Salerno S; Carl AL; Cragg A
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Nov; 127(6):929-33. PubMed ID: 16438229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density.
    Jost B; Cripton PA; Lund T; Oxland TR; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Nolte LP
    Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 9629937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.