These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9123655)

  • 1. Minimal dependence of ultrasonic propagation velocity on frequency.
    Kohles SS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(9):1297-8. PubMed ID: 9123655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonically determined thickness of long cortical bones: two-dimensional simulations of in vitro experiments.
    Moilanen P; Talmant M; Bousson V; Nicholson PH; Cheng S; Timonen J; Laugier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1818. PubMed ID: 17927441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of in vivo cortical bone thickness using ultrasonic waves.
    Mano I; Horii K; Hagino H; Miki T; Matsukawa M; Otani T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2015 Jul; 42(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 26576782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of acoustic guided wave propagation in cortical bone using a semi-analytical finite element method.
    Pereira D; Haiat G; Fernandes J; Belanger P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2538. PubMed ID: 28464675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution of longitudinal wave properties in bovine cortical bone in vitro.
    Yamato Y; Matsukawa M; Otani T; Yamazaki K; Nagano A
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e233-7. PubMed ID: 16860358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous determination of acoustic velocity and density of a cortical bone slab: ultrasonic model-based approach.
    Longo R; Grimal Q; Laugier P; Vanlanduit S; Guillaume P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):496-500. PubMed ID: 20178916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental study on the ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous bone: waveform changes during propagation.
    Fujita F; Mizuno K; Matsukawa M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4775. PubMed ID: 25669289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic assessment of fetal growth: a computer-assisted protocol.
    Stankiewicz A; Meals RL
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1988 Jun; 88(6):729-44. PubMed ID: 3294218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ultrasound and dorsal horizon radiographic view for the detection of dorsal screw penetration.
    Gurbuz Y; Kucuk L; Gunay H; Ozaksar K; Sugun TS; Bilge O
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Dec; 51(6):448-450. PubMed ID: 29092760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volume estimation from multiplanar 2D ultrasound images using a remote electromagnetic position and orientation sensor.
    Hughes SW; D'Arcy TJ; Maxwell DJ; Chiu W; Milner A; Saunders JE; Sheppard RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 8865553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visualization and GPU-accelerated simulation of medical ultrasound from CT images.
    Kutter O; Shams R; Navab N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):250-66. PubMed ID: 19249113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic tomography of biological tissue.
    Sponheim N; Gelius LJ; Johansen I; Stamnes JJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 1994 Jan; 16(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 8091550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model-based imaging.
    Sarvazyan A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1713-20. PubMed ID: 17112957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Broadband focusing ultrasonic transducers based on dimpled LiNbO3 plate with inversion layer.
    Chen J; Dai JY; Zhang C; Zhang Z; Feng G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Dec; 59(12):2797-802. PubMed ID: 23221229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D ultrasonic image feature localization based on magnetic scanhead tracking: in vitro calibration and validation.
    Detmer PR; Bashein G; Hodges T; Beach KW; Filer EP; Burns DH; Strandness DE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(9):923-36. PubMed ID: 7886852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion estimation using the firefly algorithm in ultrasonic image sequence of soft tissue.
    Chao CF; Horng MH; Chen YC
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():343217. PubMed ID: 25873987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound shear wave imaging for bone.
    Ye S; Wu J; Peach J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jun; 26(5):833-7. PubMed ID: 10942830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency Representation: Visualization and Clustering of Acoustic Data Using Self-Organizing Maps.
    Guo X; Sun S; Yu X; Wang P; Nakamura K
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 Nov; 39(6):339-347. PubMed ID: 28468573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Filtering and contrast enhancement of medical ultrasonic image].
    Chen K; Lin J; Li D; Wang T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17591276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between ultrasonic power spectrum and bone density on the heel.
    Xu Y; Xu Y; Ding Z; Chen Y; Su B; Ma Z; Sun YN
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Jan; 73():77-81. PubMed ID: 27614335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.