173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9124139)
1. Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive patients.
Bui-Mansfield LT; Youngberg RA; Warme W; Pitcher JD; Nguyen PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):913-8. PubMed ID: 9124139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The investigation and treatment of disorders of the knee: indications and a cost-comparison of arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.
Birch N; Powles D; Dorrell H; Brooks P
Health Trends; 1994; 26(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 10137727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy?
Ruwe PA; Wright J; Randall RL; Lynch JK; Jokl P; McCarthy S
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 1561332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vastly undersampled isotropic projection steady-state free precession imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance compared with conventional MR.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Klaers JL; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Block WF
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 19221057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for arthroscopy of the knee.
Vincken PW; ter Braak BP; van Erkell AR; de Rooy TP; Mallens WM; Post W; Bloem JL
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):739-46. PubMed ID: 12034943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with internal derangement of the knee.
Suarez-Almazor ME; Kaul P; Kendall CJ; Saunders LD; Johnston DW
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):392-405. PubMed ID: 10507197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [1.5-T MR of the knee: the correlations with arthroscopy].
Cerofolini E; Spina V; Miceli F; D'Alimonte P; Leoni A; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1989 May; 77(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 2748956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Traumatic knee injuries: the accuracy of MRI compared with arthroscopy.
Ng J; Baron M; Ng AC; Bessette J; Vahey T; Shelbourne KD; Chua GT
Indiana Med; 1989 Nov; 82(11):886-90. PubMed ID: 2614069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical management of the acutely locked knee.
McNally EG; Nasser KN; Dawson S; Goh LA
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):570-3. PubMed ID: 12324825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet.
Rothschild PA; Domesek JM; Kaufman L; Kramer DM; Dye SF; Anderson LJ; Lewis JL; Gon MK
Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 2343129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone contusions of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau (contrecoup injury) and associated internal derangements of the knee at MR imaging.
Kaplan PA; Gehl RH; Dussault RG; Anderson MW; Diduch DR
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 10352601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee and unjustified surgery.
Ben-Galim P; Steinberg EL; Amir H; Ash N; Dekel S; Arbel R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():100-4. PubMed ID: 16505715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests.
Lee JK; Yao L; Phelps CT; Wirth CR; Czajka J; Lozman J
Radiology; 1988 Mar; 166(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 3340785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee.
Polly DW; Callaghan JJ; Sikes RA; McCabe JM; McMahon K; Savory CG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Feb; 70(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 3343262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: fast spin-echo MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 217 examinations.
Ha TP; Li KC; Beaulieu CF; Bergman G; Ch'en IY; Eller DJ; Cheung LP; Herfkens RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1215-9. PubMed ID: 9574587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance and arthroscopy of the knee. A double-blind study in 40 patients].
D'Erme M; Ventura M; Di Giacomo G; Pasquali Lasagni M
Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 1475418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Error patterns in the MR imaging evaluation of menisci of the knee.
Justice WW; Quinn SF
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):617-21. PubMed ID: 7644620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
