330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9124904)
1. Calcium-channel blockers preserve coronary endothelial reactivity after ischemia-reperfusion.
Dagenais F; Cartier R; Hollmann C; Buluran J
Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Apr; 63(4):1050-6. PubMed ID: 9124904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clentiazem and diltiazem preserve endothelium-dependent relaxation following global rat heart ischemia.
Dagenais F; Hollmann C; Buluran J; Cartier R
Can J Cardiol; 1995 Oct; 11(9):816-22. PubMed ID: 7585280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-dose calcium antagonists reduce energy demand and cellular damage of isolated hearts during both ischemia and reperfusion.
Becker BF; Möbert J
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 1999 Sep; 360(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 10543430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential cardiovascular effects of calcium channel blocking agents: potential mechanisms.
Millard RW; Lathrop DA; Grupp G; Ashraf M; Grupp IL; Schwartz A
Am J Cardiol; 1982 Feb; 49(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 6277175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chronotropic, inotropic, and vasodilator actions of diltiazem, nifedipine, and verapamil. A comparative study of physiological responses and membrane receptor activity.
Millard RW; Grupp G; Grupp IL; DiSalvo J; DePover A; Schwartz A
Circ Res; 1983 Feb; 52(2 Pt 2):I29-39. PubMed ID: 6831652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effects of verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine on hemodynamics and left ventricular function during acute myocardial ischemia in dogs.
Urquhart J; Patterson RE; Bacharach SL; Green MV; Speir EH; Aamodt R; Epstein SE
Circulation; 1984 Feb; 69(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 6690104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociation of cardiodepression from cardioprotection with calcium antagonists: diltiazem protects ischemic rat myocardium with a lower functional cost as compared with verapamil or nifedipine.
Grover GJ; Sleph PG
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1989 Aug; 14(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 2476610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effects of calcium-channel blocking agents on left ventricular function during acute ischemia in dogs with and without congestive heart failure.
Urquhart J; Epstein SE; Patterson RE
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 55(3):10B-16B. PubMed ID: 3969856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the cardiac and vasodilatory effects of some calcium entry blockers in perfused isolated guinea-pig hearts.
Boddeke HW; Wilffert B; Heynis JB; van de Haar Keuken V; Jonkman FA; van Zwieten PA
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1987 Aug; 288(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 3675080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The haemodynamic effects of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease. A review.
Soward AL; Vanhaleweyk GL; Serruys PW
Drugs; 1986 Jul; 32(1):66-101. PubMed ID: 2874975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of calcium entry blockers on coronary constriction and myocardial ischemia due to leukotriene D4.
Ezra D; Boyd LM; Goldstein RE; Feuerstein G
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1985 Apr; 233(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 3981457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of calcium channel inhibitors on the myocardial uptake and retention of technetium 99m N-NOET, a new myocardial perfusion imaging agent: a study on isolated perfused rat hearts.
Riou L; Ghezzi C; Pasqualini R; Fagret D
J Nucl Cardiol; 2000; 7(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 10958279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Calcium antagonists: effect on peripheral and coronary hemodynamics].
Simon R
Z Kardiol; 1984; 73 Suppl 2():79-88. PubMed ID: 6528705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resistance of the failing dystrophic hamster heart to the cardioprotective effects of diltiazem and clentiazem: evidence of coronary vascular dysfunctions.
Tanguay M; Jasmin G; Blaise G; Dumont L
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 73(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 8564877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potent antifibrillatory effect of combined blockade of calcium channels and 5-HT2 receptors with nexopamil during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in dogs: comparison to diltiazem.
Nearing BD; Hutter JJ; Verrier RL
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):777-87. PubMed ID: 8761843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevention of reperfusion damage in working rat hearts by calcium antagonists and calmodulin antagonists.
Higgins AJ; Blackburn KJ
J Mol Cell Cardiol; 1984 May; 16(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 6737483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of the vasodilator effect of verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem on isolated perfused coronary arteries of rabbit.
Kaur AH; Singh M; Singh J
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1984; 28(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 6519762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative pharmacological properties among calcium channel blockers: T-channel versus L-channel blockade.
Noll G; Lüscher TF
Cardiology; 1998; 89 Suppl 1():10-5. PubMed ID: 9570424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effects of bepridil, diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil on haemodynamic parameters and myocardial oxygen consumption in anaesthetized dogs.
Beaughard M; Michelin MT; Tisne-Versailles J; Lamar JC
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1986 Dec; 284(2):276-96. PubMed ID: 3493742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between negative inotropic and vasodilator effects of calcium antagonists acting on extra- and intracellular calcium movements in rat and guinea-pig cardiac preparations.
Hugtenburg JG; Mathy MJ; Boddeke HW; Beckeringh JJ; van Zwieten PA
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 1989 Nov; 340(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 2615848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
