These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9125915)

  • 1. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct.
    Guenin LM
    Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.
    Resnik DB; Neal T; Raymond A; Kissling GE
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25275621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis).
    Ryan KJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.
    Buzzelli DE
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
    Mishkin B
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should the government assure scientific integrity?
    Klein DF
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 8396939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academic and scientific misconduct: issues for nursing educators.
    Hansen BC; Hansen KD
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7844280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
    Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which ethics for science and public policy?
    Irving DN; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sanctions for research misconduct: a legal perspective.
    Dresser R
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 8396938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The problem of plagiarism.
    Anderson MS; Steneck NH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science.
    Dustira AK
    Prof Ethics; 1996; 5(1-2):139-56. PubMed ID: 11813726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
    Friedman PJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
    Pascal CB
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Off with their heads: the need to criminalize some forms of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Caplan AL
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 16083091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.