These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9126034)
41. Achieving accuracy for routine clinical chemistry methods by using patient specimen correlations to assign calibrator values. A means of managing matrix effects. Lasky FD Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 8466405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Blood serum analyses in population studies: parallel analyses and degree of agreement in a Norwegian-Russian co-project. The Svalbard Study. Nilssen O; Lipton R; Höyer G; Bojko J; Tkatchev A; Brenn T Arctic Med Res; 1996 Apr; 55(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 8754602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Serum lipid profiles including non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Turkish school-children. Uçar B; Kiliç Z; Dinleyici EC; Colak O; Güneş E Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2007 Dec; 7(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 18065339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design. Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The need for accurate total cholesterol measurement. Recommended analytical goals, current state of reliability, and guidelines for better determinations. Naito HK Clin Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 9(1):37-60. PubMed ID: 2647375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reflotron performance in a community screening program: results of the Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project. Havas S; Bishop R; Koumjian L; Reisman J; Wozenski S Am J Prev Med; 1991; 7(6):397-405. PubMed ID: 1790049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. College of American Pathologists-Centers for Disease Control collaborative study for evaluating reference materials for total serum cholesterol measurements. Myers GL; Schap D; Smith SJ; Cooper GR; Hartmann AE; Gilmore B; Suenram CA; Ray DH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Dec; 114(12):1199-205. PubMed ID: 2252414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Point: status of lipid and lipoprotein standardization. McNamara JR; Leary ET; Ceriotti F; Boersma-Cobbaert CM; Cole TG; Hassemer DJ; Nakamura M; Packard CJ; Seccombe DW; Kimberly MM; Myers GL; Cooper GR Clin Chem; 1997 Aug; 43(8 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 9267305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Validation of a reference method for total cholesterol measurement in human serum and assignation of reference values to proficiency testing samples. Heuillet M; Lalere B; Peignaux M; De Graeve J; Vaslin-Reimann S; Pais De Barros JP; Gambert P; Duvillard L; Delatour V Clin Biochem; 2013 Mar; 46(4-5):359-64. PubMed ID: 23219742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. International quality assurance schemes for cholesterol. Grafnetter D Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1990; 198():32-42. PubMed ID: 2161131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Evaluation of the determination of total cholesterol in Chilean clinical laboratories]. Quiroga T; Goycoolea M; Poblete C; Gómez R; Rodríguez L Rev Med Chil; 1993 Jun; 121(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 8278703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. McNamara JR; Schaefer EJ Clin Chim Acta; 1987 Jun; 166(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3608193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparable laboratory performances in the analysis of lead in control samples and in fresh human blood. Morisi G; Patriarca M; Taggi F Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1989; 25(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 2624353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reference methods--with special reference to cholesterol. Stender S Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1989; 194():63-7. PubMed ID: 2772557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A simple, cost-effective quality assurance model for measurement of lipids in a large epidemiological study. Lakshmy R; Gupta R; Kartha CC; Malathi T; Nigam PK; Akarte NR; Sampson U; Borkotoky S; Doiphode DN; Arora U; Prabhakaran D; Reddy KS Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 19691216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs. Welch MJ; Hertz HS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Measurement performance of reagent manufacturers by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network lipid standardization specified for metabolic syndrome-focused health checkups program in Japan. Nakamura M; Koyama I; Iso H; Sato S; Okazaki M; Kiyama M; Shimamoto T; Konishi M J Atheroscler Thromb; 2009; 16(6):756-63. PubMed ID: 19763016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Routine serum lipid analysis in New Zealand. Munster DJ; Lever M; Andre CM; Carrell RW N Z Med J; 1978 Aug; 88(617):93-7. PubMed ID: 280786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Laboratory standardization of a large international clinical trial: the DAIS experience. DAIS Project Group. Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study. McGuinness C; Seccombe DW; Frohlich JJ; Ehnholm C; Sundvall J; Steiner G Clin Biochem; 2000 Feb; 33(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 10693982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Interlaboratory comparison of DNA image analysis. Thunnissen FB; Ellis IO; Jütting U Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Oct; 12(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 8933906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]