These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9126718)
41. Baltimore throws in the towel. Hamilton DP Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. ORI and misconduct investigations. Bivens LW Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The aftermath of the Gallo case. Anderson C Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo. Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. ORI's self-assessment: a batting average of .920? Friedly J Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5304):1255. PubMed ID: 9064778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside. Youngner JS JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud. O'Reilly JT Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. ORI drops Gallo case in legal dispute. Anderson C Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5137):1202-3. PubMed ID: 8235643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Inquiry finds misconduct by virus researcher; Gallo predicts appeal will overturn finding. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(6):723-4. PubMed ID: 8380877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight. Marris E Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility? Wigodsky HS IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Popovic is cleared on all charges; Gallo case in doubt. Anderson C Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5136):981-3. PubMed ID: 8235636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime? Redman BK; Merz JF Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries. Kaiser J Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Sanctions for research misconduct: a legal perspective. Dresser R Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 8396938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case. Stone R Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Scientific misconduct. Federal panel recommends universities play bigger role. Stone R Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5197):449. PubMed ID: 7824941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]