These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9127076)
1. Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture. Albrecht-Olsen P; Lind T; Kristensen G; Falkenberg B Arthroscopy; 1997 Apr; 13(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 9127076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refixation: biomechanical evaluation. Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Jul; 12(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 14689168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Song EK; Lee KB Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems. Zantop T; Eggers AK; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W Am J Sports Med; 2004 Jun; 32(4):863-9. PubMed ID: 15150031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position. Robinson JR; Frank EG; Hunter AJ; Jermin PJ; Gill HS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):924-932. PubMed ID: 29364699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New suture method for radial tears of the meniscus: biomechanical analysis of cross-suture and double horizontal suture techniques using cyclic load testing. Matsubara H; Okazaki K; Izawa T; Tashiro Y; Matsuda S; Nishimura T; Nakanishi Y; Kawamura H; Iwamoto Y Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):414-8. PubMed ID: 22016457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cyclic test comparison of all-inside device and inside-out sutures for radial meniscus lesion repair: an in vitro porcine model study. Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN Arthroscopy; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1873-81. PubMed ID: 23085200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs. Mitchell R; Pitts R; Kim YM; Matava MJ Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 26422709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of different suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears. Feucht MJ; Grande E; Brunhuber J; Burgkart R; Imhoff AB; Braun S Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2784-90. PubMed ID: 24013348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]