These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9127585)

  • 1. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.
    Rottenstreich Y; Tversky A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 9127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probability judgment and subadditivity: the role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval.
    Dougherty MR; Hunter J
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):968-82. PubMed ID: 14651303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination.
    Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):344-66. PubMed ID: 9162950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forecasting trial outcomes: lawyers assign higher probability to possibilities that are described in greater detail.
    Fox CR; Birke R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Apr; 26(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 11985296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence evaluation: measure Z corresponds to human utility judgments better than measure L and optimal-experimental-design models.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; D'Addario M; Russo S; Cherubini P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):703-23. PubMed ID: 24446753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
    Koehler DJ; James G
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond.
    Téglás E; Girotto V; Gonzalez M; Bonatti LL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Nov; 104(48):19156-9. PubMed ID: 18025482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The probability of conditionals: A review.
    López-Astorga M; Ragni M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34173186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability.
    Byrne RMJ; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):760-780. PubMed ID: 31647286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An account of subjective probability judgment for joint events: Conjunctive and disjunctive.
    Fisk JE; Marshall DA; Rogers P; Stock R
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 60(5):405-420. PubMed ID: 31242534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.
    Dubljević V; Sattler S; Racine E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204631. PubMed ID: 30273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How psychological framing affects economic market prices in the lab and field.
    Sonnemann U; Camerer CF; Fox CR; Langer T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jul; 110(29):11779-84. PubMed ID: 23818628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.