255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9127768)
1. The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis.
Bladin CF; Alexandrova NA; Murphy J; Alexandrov AV; Maggisano R; Norris JW
Int Angiol; 1996 Dec; 15(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 9127768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid Stenosis Index. A new method of measuring internal carotid artery stenosis.
Bladin CF; Alexandrov AV; Murphy J; Maggisano R; Norris JW
Stroke; 1995 Feb; 26(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 7831693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical applicability of methods to measure carotid stenosis.
Alexandrov AV; Bladin CF; Murphy J; Hamilton P; Maggisano R
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 1994; 4(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 26486248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography.
Shaalan WE; Wahlgren CM; Desai T; Piano G; Skelly C; Bassiouny HS
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jul; 48(1):104-12; discussion 112-3. PubMed ID: 18486416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement.
Wardlaw JM; Lewis S
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15964165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.
Eliasziw M; Smith RF; Singh N; Holdsworth DW; Fox AJ; Barnett HJ
Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery.
Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K
Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning.
Moneta GL; Edwards JM; Chitwood RW; Taylor LM; Lee RW; Cummings CA; Porter JM
J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 17(1):152-7; discussion 157-9. PubMed ID: 8421332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid bifurcation stenoses: is it reliable?
MacKenzie KS; French-Sherry E; Burns K; Pooley T; Bassiouny HS
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2002; 36(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 11951099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Angiographic quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery].
Bartylla K; Huber G
Radiologe; 1995 Nov; 35(11):801-7. PubMed ID: 8657881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Three-dimensional DSA imaging and 3-dimensional measurement of cross section for internal carotid artery stenosis].
Iwai R; Tsumura K; Kuwayama N; Hirashima Y; Endo S
No To Shinkei; 2003 Aug; 55(8):661-7. PubMed ID: 13677299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography.
Padayachee TS; Cox TC; Modaresi KB; Colchester AC; Taylor PR
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1997 Feb; 13(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 9091152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring carotid artery stenosis--comparison of postmortem arteriograms with the planimetric gold standard.
Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Droste DW; Kollár J; Beyna T; Felszeghy S; Módis L; Hegedüs C; Ringelstein EB; Csiba L
J Neurol; 2005 May; 252(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 15778910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.
Rothwell PM; Gibson RJ; Slattery J; Sellar RJ; Warlow CP
Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2435-9. PubMed ID: 7974586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.
Rothwell PM; Warlow CP
Stroke; 2000 Mar; 31(3):622-30. PubMed ID: 10700495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis.
Dix JE; McNulty BJ; Kallmes DF
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Aug; 19(7):1215-8. PubMed ID: 9726455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods.
Kılıçkap G; Ergun E; Başbay E; Koşar P; Kosar U
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 21858656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power Doppler imaging of carotid artery stenosis. Comparison with color Doppler flow imaging and angiography.
Steinke W; Ries S; Artemis N; Schwartz A; Hennerici M
Stroke; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1981-7. PubMed ID: 9341707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography.
Saba L; Mallarini G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 20498548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
