255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9127768)
21. Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses.
Staikov IN; Nedeltchev K; Arnold M; Remonda L; Schroth G; Sturzenegger M; Herrmann C; Rivoir A; Mattle HP
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002 Jun; 30(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 12116107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of stenosis: implications of variability of Doppler measurements in normal-appearing carotid arteries.
Lee VS; Hertzberg BS; Kliewer MA; Carroll BA
Radiology; 1999 Aug; 212(2):493-8. PubMed ID: 10429708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment.
Fillinger MF; Baker RJ; Zwolak RM; Musson A; Lenz JE; Mott J; Bech FR; Walsh DB; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 24(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 8918334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of carotid artery dimensions and lesion length measured by B-mode ultrasonography and quantitative angiography in patients with severe stenosis undergoing percutaneous revascularization.
Harmon L; Boccalandro F
J Clin Ultrasound; 2014 Jun; 42(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 24449254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Carotid stenosis index revisited with direct CT angiography measurement of carotid arteries to quantify carotid stenosis.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Fox AJ
Stroke; 2007 Feb; 38(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 17170356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion?
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Aug; 13(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement of carotid stenosis using duplex ultrasonography with a microconvex array transducer: a validation with cerebral angiography.
Tateishi Y; Tsujino A; Hamabe J; Tasaki O; Morikawa M; Horie N; Hayashi K; Nagata I
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(8):e360-5. PubMed ID: 23608369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The accuracy of angiography and CT angiography of the carotid bifurcation compared to macro-morphological correlation].
Post K; Eckstein HH; Hoffmann E; Volke A; Post S; Allenberg JR; Kauffmann GW
Rofo; 1996 Mar; 164(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 8672773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography--time for a reappraisal?
Griffiths GD; Razzaq R; Farrell A; Ashleigh R; Charlesworth D
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 21(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11237785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease.
Lee VS; Hertzberg BS; Workman MJ; Smith TP; Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Carroll BA
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 10671585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of DSA in carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between stenosis measured on carotid endarterectomy specimens and DSA in 644 cases.
Svoboda N; Bradac O; Mandys V; Netuka D; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3197-3202. PubMed ID: 35945355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.
Rothwell PM; Gibson RJ; Slattery J; Warlow CP
Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2440-4. PubMed ID: 7974587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.
Staikov IN; Arnold M; Mattle HP; Remonda L; Sturzenegger M; Baumgartner RW; Schroth G
J Neurol; 2000 Sep; 247(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 11081806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct B-mode NASCET-style stenosis measurement and Doppler ultrasound as parameters for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.
Rotstein AH; Gibson RN; King PM
Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11966587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study.
Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN
Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?
Gagne PJ; Matchett J; MacFarland D; Hauer-Jensen M; Barone GW; Eidt JF; Barnes RW
J Vasc Surg; 1996 Sep; 24(3):449-55; discussion 455-6. PubMed ID: 8808967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
van Prehn J; Muhs BE; Pramanik B; Ollenschleger M; Rockman CB; Cayne NS; Adelman MA; Jacobowitz GR; Maldonado TS
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved Carotid Stenosis Quantification on Novel 4D/3D-Doppler Ultrasonography Indexing to the Common Carotid Artery.
Macharzina RR; Kocher S; Messe SR; Kammerer T; Hoffmann F; Vogt M; Vach W; Fan N; Rastan A; Neumann FJ; Zeller T
Ultraschall Med; 2020 Apr; 41(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 31141825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography.
McKinney AM; Casey SO; Teksam M; Lucato LT; Smith M; Truwit CL; Kieffer S
Neuroradiology; 2005 Jan; 47(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15650832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
