These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9128155)
1. A cheap earphone for small animals with good frequency response in the ultrasonic frequency range. Schuller G J Neurosci Methods; 1997 Feb; 71(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 9128155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended high frequency audiometry in pre-school children. Reuter W; Schönfeld U; Mansmann U; Fischer R; Gross M Audiology; 1998; 37(5):285-94. PubMed ID: 9776205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception. Pytte CL; Ficken MS; Moiseff A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Aug; 190(8):665-73. PubMed ID: 15164219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiogram of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). Koay G; Heffner HE; Heffner RS Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):202-10. PubMed ID: 9083817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone. Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants. Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The postnatal development of frequency-place code and tuning characteristics in the auditory midbrain of the phyllostomid bat, Carollia perspicillata. Sterbing SJ; Schmidt U; Rübsamen R Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 76(1-2):133-46. PubMed ID: 7928706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry. Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions. Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol. Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory sensitivity of the albino rat. Kelly JB; Masterton B J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1977 Aug; 91(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 893752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz. Han LA; Poulsen T Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9638829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of the chinchilla pinna and ear canal in electrophysiological measures of hearing thresholds. Murphy WJ; Davis RR J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1951-6. PubMed ID: 9566318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing thresholds for pure tones above 16 kHz. Ashihara K J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL52. PubMed ID: 17927307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency thresholds of rat cochlear nerve fibers. Zheng CM; Ito S; Minami S; Horikawa J; Murata K Jpn J Physiol; 1992; 42(3):459-72. PubMed ID: 1434105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]