These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9128770)

  • 1. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis.
    Grünig R; Morscher E; Ochsner PE
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1997; 116(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 9128770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years.
    Böhm P; Bischel O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Jul; 83(7):1023-31. PubMed ID: 11451971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
    Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Wagner revision of prosthesis stem].
    Wehrli U
    Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed; 1991; 84(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 1805902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky type
    Nuerailijiang Y; Li Y; Guo X; Wuhuzi W; Zhao X; Xu Z; Zhang X; Cao L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Jul; 38(7):842-848. PubMed ID: 39013822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cement-free diaphyseal fixation principle for hip shaft exchange in large bone defects--analysis of 12 years experience with the Wagner revision shaft].
    Böhm P; Bischel O
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 11486626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using Wagner SL revision stem in femoral intertrochanteric fractures for patients with old fracture or painful arthritis before injury].
    Chen XW; Ye RQ; Xu HP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Mar; 30(3):264-269. PubMed ID: 29349968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up.
    Blackley HR; Davis AM; Hutchison CR; Gross AE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 83(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 11263637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
    Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.
    Springer BD; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Nov; 85(11):2156-62. PubMed ID: 14630846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
    Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.
    Zhang Q; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Huddleston JI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 26245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.