139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9129923)
1. Predictive value of the anatomical location of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant prostate biopsies for the nodal status of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Dunzinger M; Sega W; Madersbacher S; Schorn A
Eur Urol; 1997; 31(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 9129923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preoperative assessment of tumor aggressiveness in localized prostatic carcinoma].
Hammerer P; Henke RP; Hübner D; Huland H
Urologe A; 1995 Sep; 34(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 7483160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should we reconsider the indications for ileo-obturator node dissection with localized prostate cancer?
Sullivan LD; Rabbani F
Br J Urol; 1995 Jan; 75(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The factors that affect the prediction of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Turk H; Ün S; Koca O; Cinkaya A; Kodaz H; Zorlu F
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1094-1098. PubMed ID: 30197355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Stamatiou K; Alevizos A; Karanasiou V; Mariolis A; Mihas C; Papathanasiou M; Bovis K; Sofras F
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 17495488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Relationship between screening by stratifying cases into groups on prostate specific antigen level and the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic sextant prostate biopsy].
Cao XL; Gao JP; Han G; Tang J; Hong BF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):372-5. PubMed ID: 16638344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by random biopsies in 60 patients clinically negative but with PSA greater than 8.9 ng/ml].
Bianchi A; Bottanelli A; Baroni G; Rovellini P; Sciaraffia G; Toia G; Marcelli G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1997 Dec; 69(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 9477617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Gajendran V; Taylor SP; Tewari A; Presti JC; Leidich R; Lo R; Palmer K; Shinohara K; Spaulding JT
Urology; 1995 Aug; 46(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 7542823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.
Burkhard FC; Bader P; Schneider E; Markwalder R; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):84-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 12160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.
Rahman S; Cosmatos H; Dave G; Williams S; Tome M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):906-10. PubMed ID: 21300478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Fournier G; Gajendran V; Leidich R; Lo R; Wolf JS; Jacob G; Nicolaisen G; Palmer K; Freiha F
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 7524237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.
Ackerman DA; Barry JM; Wicklund RA; Olson N; Lowe BA
J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1845-50. PubMed ID: 7693981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies.
Borboroglu PG; Comer SW; Riffenburgh RH; Amling CL
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 10604336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
