These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9130210)

  • 1. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 9130210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects.
    Divenyi PL; Haupt KM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 9058037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Noise Type and Semantic Predictability on Word Recall in Older Listeners and Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    Carter BL; Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Sep; 65(9):3548-3565. PubMed ID: 35973100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 38(5):1150-6. PubMed ID: 8558883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition.
    Phillips SL; Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ; Yeni-Komshian G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):217-28. PubMed ID: 10668664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.
    Hargus SE; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 7731214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1276-85. PubMed ID: 8114494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the recognition of reverberant speech by elderly listeners.
    Halling DC; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):414-31. PubMed ID: 10757693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.