519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9130854)
21. When Medicine Went Mad, edited by Arthur L. Caplan.
Marsh FH
J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 11643144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Judging the scientists who conducted radiation experiments.
Hunt L
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():B1-2. PubMed ID: 11658068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Nazi origins of an anatomy text: the Pernkopf atlas.
Israel HA; Seidelman WE
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1633; author reply 1634. PubMed ID: 8922441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Max Planck Society admits to its predecessor's Nazi links.
Abbott A
Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6839):726. PubMed ID: 11460097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Exhibition examines scientists' complicity in Nazi-era atrocities.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1992 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11646959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reflections on the fiftieth anniversary of the Doctors' Trial.
Annas GJ; Grodin MA
Health Hum Rights; 1996; 2(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 11657276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Modern medicine and the emergence of biomedical ethics.
Grunfeld GB
Caduceus; 1992; 8(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 1643532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. It's the patient.
Gaudiani VA
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(4):33. PubMed ID: 9130858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. What should we do about Eduard Pernkopf's atlas?
Riggs G
Acad Med; 1998 Apr; 73(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 9580714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Whither Nuremberg?: medicine's continuing Nazi heritage.
Seidelman WE
Med Glob Surviv; 1995 Sep; 2(3):148-57. PubMed ID: 14627017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Closing the door on Nazi data.
Berger RL
Shma; 1995 Oct; 26(499):7-8. PubMed ID: 11653171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An unholy alliance. The Nazis showed that 'politically responsible' science risks losing its soul.
Deichmann U
Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6788):739. PubMed ID: 10866177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Using Nazi experimental data -- asking the right question.
Freundel B
Shma; 1995 Mar; 25(490):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Ethics and access to teaching materials in the medical library: the case of the Pernkopf atlas.
Atlas MC
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Jan; 89(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11209801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Lobotomy versus Nazi experiments. Less rigidity is required in the debate on medical ethics].
Lynöe N
Lakartidningen; 1999 Dec; 96(50):5605-6. PubMed ID: 10643217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Response to Pross.
Weinberger F
J Med Ethics; 1992 Dec; 18(4):219. PubMed ID: 1460651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Fourth International Congress of Ethics in Medicine (Jerusalem, 13-18 October 1991).
Greene VW
Int Dig Health Legis; 1992; 43(4):860-5. PubMed ID: 11659639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical selection: Auschwitz antecedents and effluent.
Seidelman WE
Int J Health Serv; 1991; 21(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 1917203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Nazi doctors and the medical community; honor or censure? The case of Hans Sewering.
White LW
J Med Humanit; 1996; 17(2):119-35. PubMed ID: 11645778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
