These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9130919)

  • 1. Ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technologies. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Fertil Steril; 1997 May; 67(5 Suppl 1):i-iii, 1S-9S. PubMed ID: 9130919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Oocyte and embryo donation and surrogacy. Religious, medico-social, ethical, financial and legal problems].
    Kozovski I; Kovachev M; Angelova K; Alexandrov K; Kozovski G; Markova V
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(2):43-6. PubMed ID: 20734677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. By the Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3 Suppl 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 3743811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cost-effectiveness comparison of embryo donation with oocyte donation.
    Finger R; Sommerfelt C; Freeman M; Wilson CK; Wade A; Daly D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):379-81. PubMed ID: 19406398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. Ethics Committee of The American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6 Suppl 2):1S-104S. PubMed ID: 2189753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].
    Letur H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Dec; 36(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 17850990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Ethical questions of oocyte donation].
    Lampé L; Bodnár B
    Orv Hetil; 1994 Jul; 135(30):1641-4. PubMed ID: 8065743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies.
    Shapo HS
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assisted reproductive technologies. Clinical and biological aspects and ethical considerations].
    Deffieux X
    Rev Prat; 2004 Jun; 54(12):1375-82. PubMed ID: 15461060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Financial incentives in recruitment of oocyte donors. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Aug; 74(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 10970169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A model code of practice in accordance with the Dutch Embryo act].
    Braat DD; Kaandorp CJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 May; 148(21):1030-3. PubMed ID: 15185437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
    Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ASRM Practice Committee response to Rybak and Lieman: elective self-donation of oocytes.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1513-4. PubMed ID: 19836735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Herz EK
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared-risk or refund programs in assisted reproduction. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):414-5. PubMed ID: 9757867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economics versus ethics in reproductive medicine.
    Feinman M
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 12199236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-tube babies: ethical considerations.
    Walters L
    Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 3595053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.