152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9131490)
21. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix].
Matsuyama T; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Iwasaka T; Saito T; Uchino H; Nakano H; Matsukuma K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease.
Tierney KE; Lin PS; Amezcua C; Matsuo K; Ye W; Felix JC; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):366.e1-366.e5. PubMed ID: 24370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up.
Ioffe OB; Brooks SE; De Rezende RB; Silverberg SG
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 10202667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins.
Montz FJ; Holschneider CH; Thompson LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):976-82. PubMed ID: 8497366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].
Kazadi Buanga J; Acosta Vazquez MJ
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Dec; 89(12):602-5. PubMed ID: 7846467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision].
Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Wertz JP; Cuénin C; Ritter J; Philippe E
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9091546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical conization: cold knife and laser excision in residency training.
Delmore J; Horbelt DV; Kallail KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):1016-9. PubMed ID: 1579298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Endocervical curettage. Its use in the colposcopic assessment of a patient who has an abnormal cervico-vaginal smear].
Bergeron C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 2081876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease.
Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conservative Treatment for Patients with Carcinoma in Situ-Positive Margins After a Loop Electroexcisional Procedure: Is It Safe?
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee YS; Cho YL; Park JY; Hong DG
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(1-2):37-44. PubMed ID: 29999280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression predicts recurrence of cervical dysplasia following loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Farley J; Uyehara C; Hashiro G; Belnap C; Birrer M; Salminen E
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Feb; 92(2):596-602. PubMed ID: 14766253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can a more detailed evaluation of excision margins refine cytologic follow-up of women post-LLETZ for high-grade dysplasia?
Treacy A; Devaney D; Mulligan NJ; Boyd W; O'Keane JC
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 Sep; 29(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 20736775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
