These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9131822)

  • 1. So carcinogens have thresholds: how do we decide what exposure levels should be considered safe?
    Wilson JD
    Risk Anal; 1997 Feb; 17(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9131822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk from low-dose exposures.
    Zendzian RP
    Science; 1994 Nov; 266(5188):1142-3. PubMed ID: 7973686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A regulatory view on the article: Risk evaluation of carcinogens and their threshold levels, part I-III].
    Dieter HH; Konietzka R
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Sep; 49(9):921-5. PubMed ID: 16953360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [What is the understanding of the scientific basis and the regulatory toxicology associated with the term "not appreciable " in the risk evaluation of carcinogens].
    Dieter HH; Konietzka R; Neumann HG
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1084-5. PubMed ID: 17676413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk from low-dose exposures.
    Portier CJ; Lucier GW; Edler L
    Science; 1994 Nov; 266(5188):1141-2. PubMed ID: 7973685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The evaluation of occupational exposure to carcinogenic substances: limit values and risk assessments].
    Apostoli P; Porru S; Alessio L
    G Ital Med Lav; 1990; 12(5-6):201-7. PubMed ID: 2152617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correct equations for calculating the maximum allowable fish consumption rate for human health risk assessment considering the noncarcinogenic effects of multiple contaminants in fish.
    Yu Y; Zhang D; Zhang X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10481-2. PubMed ID: 22989162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The maximum tolerated dose for inhalation bioassays: toxicity vs overload.
    Morrow PE; Haseman JK; Hobbs CH; Driscoll KE; Vu V; Oberdörster G
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1996 Feb; 29(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 8742311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The risk of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins in human milk.
    Bartmess JE
    J Hum Lact; 1988 Sep; 4(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 3251529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of 'secondary mechanism' in the regulation of carcinogens; a chronology.
    Scheuplein RJ
    Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 7600537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens].
    Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG
    Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The carcinogenicity debate on formaldehyde: How to derive safe exposure limits?
    Bolt HM; Degen GH; Hengstler JG
    Arch Toxicol; 2010 Jun; 84(6):421-2. PubMed ID: 20480361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens.
    Felter SP; Conolly RB; Bercu JP; Bolger PM; Boobis AR; Bos PM; Carthew P; Doerrer NG; Goodman JI; Harrouk WA; Kirkland DJ; Lau SS; Llewellyn GC; Preston RJ; Schoeny R; Schnatter AR; Tritscher A; van Velsen F; Williams GM
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 41(6):507-44. PubMed ID: 21591905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chlorine industry says EPA rules ignore good science.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6738):718. PubMed ID: 10391226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of nongenotoxic carcinogens based upon cell proliferation/death rates in rodents.
    Gaylor DW; Zheng Q
    Risk Anal; 1996 Apr; 16(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 8638041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A molecular approach to cancer risk.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Apr; 268(5209):356-7. PubMed ID: 7716533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Receptor-mediated events and the evaluation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of dioxin risks.
    Sewall CH; Lucier GW
    Mutat Res; 1995 Dec; 333(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 8538618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hormesis and the law.
    Heinzerling L; Lechleider RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Mar; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 11326779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is ionizing radiation regulated more stringently than chemical carcinogens?
    Travis CC; Pack SR; Hattemer-Frey HA
    Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 2925392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.