149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9132095)
1. MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model.
Lee FT; Grist TM; Nelson KG; Chosy SG; Rappe AH; Shapiro SS; Kelcz F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 9132095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
Duan N; Chen X; Yin Y; Wang Z; Chen R
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
Unterweger M; De Geyter C; Fröhlich JM; Bongartz G; Wiesner W
Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
Volondat M; Fontas E; Delotte J; Fatfouta I; Chevallier P; Chassang M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis].
Salata I; Gottwald L; Sobkiewicz S
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report.
Wiesner W; Ruehm SG; Bongartz G; Kaim A; Reese E; De Geyter C
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(8):1439-44. PubMed ID: 11519555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
Winter L; Glücker T; Steimann S; Fröhlich JM; Steinbrich W; De Geyter C; Pegios W
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
De Felice C; Rech F; Marini A; Stagnitti A; Valente F; Cipolla V; Borgogni G; Meggiorini ML
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency.
Sadowski EA; Ochsner JE; Riherd JM; Korosec FR; Agrawal G; Pritts EA; Kliewer MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1381-5. PubMed ID: 18941073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasound hysterosalpingography with levovist in the diagnosis of tubaric patency].
Guazzaroni M; Mari A; Politi C; Guazzaroni M; Remedi S; Mallarini G; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001; 102(1-2):62-6. PubMed ID: 11677440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of Fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11534279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography.
Gagliardi JA; Chung EM; Chandnani VP; Kesling KL; Christensen KP; Null RN; Radvany MG; Hansen MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 8079858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency-A comparative study.
Jagannathan D; Hithaya F
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2019; 29(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31367087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center.
Agrawal N; Fayyaz S
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
Kahyaoglu S; Yumusak OH; Kahyaoglu I; Kucukbas GN; Esercan A; Tasci Y
J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution.
Boudghène FP; Bazot M; Robert Y; Perrot N; Rocourt N; Antoine JM; Morris H; Leroy JL; Uzan S; Bigot JM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
