BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9133062)

  • 1. A retrospective study of clinical and laboratory characteristics of ovine footrot.
    Liu D; Roycroft C; Samuel J; Webber J
    Vet Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 42(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 9133062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dichelobacter nodosus: differentiation of virulent and benign strains by gene probe based dot blot hybridisation.
    Liu D; Yong WK
    Vet Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 38(1-2):71-9. PubMed ID: 8128604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of gene probes of Dichelobacter nodosus for differentiating strains causing virulent, intermediate or benign ovine footrot.
    Liu D
    Br Vet J; 1994; 150(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 7953579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The virulence of Dichelobacter nodosus, measured by the elastase test, is an important predictor for virulent footrot diagnosis in New South Wales sheep flocks.
    Collins A; Collins D; Dhungyel O
    Aust Vet J; 2023 Dec; 101(12):522-530. PubMed ID: 37794558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the commonly used virulence tests for laboratory diagnosis of ovine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus in Australia.
    Dhungyel OP; Hill AE; Dhand NK; Whittington RJ
    Vet Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 162(2-4):756-760. PubMed ID: 23084506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Severity and persistence of footrot in Merino sheep experimentally infected with a protease thermostable strain of Dichelobacter nodosus at five sites.
    Depiazzi LJ; Roberts WD; Hawkins CD; Palmer MA; Pitman DR; Mcquade NC; Jelinek PD; Devereaux DJ; Rippon RJ
    Aust Vet J; 1998 Jan; 76(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9578765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterisation of Dichelobacter nodosus and detection of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Treponema spp. in sheep with different clinical manifestations of footrot.
    Frosth S; König U; Nyman AK; Pringle M; Aspán A
    Vet Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 179(1-2):82-90. PubMed ID: 25796133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Genotypic and Phenotypic Protease Virulence Tests for Dichelobacter nodosus Infection in Sheep.
    McPherson AS; Dhungyel OP; Whittington RJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 May; 55(5):1313-1326. PubMed ID: 28202796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A degrading proteinase test to distinguish benign and virulent ovine isolates of Bacteroides nodosus.
    Depiazzi LJ; Richards RB
    Aust Vet J; 1979 Jan; 55(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 435206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A polymerase chain reaction assay for improved determination of virulence of Dichelobacter nodosus, the specific causative pathogen for ovine footrot.
    Liu D; Webber J
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 43(2-3):197-207. PubMed ID: 7740758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic evidence for a globally distributed, bimodal population in the ovine footrot pathogen Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Kennan RM; Gilhuus M; Frosth S; Seemann T; Dhungyel OP; Whittington RJ; Boyce JD; Powell DR; Aspán A; Jørgensen HJ; Bulach DM; Rood JI
    mBio; 2014 Sep; 5(5):e01821-14. PubMed ID: 25271288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved diagnosis of virulent ovine footrot using the intA gene.
    Cheetham BF; Tanjung LR; Sutherland M; Druitt J; Green G; McFarlane J; Bailey GD; Seaman JT; Katz ME
    Vet Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 116(1-3):166-74. PubMed ID: 16716540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of a rtPCR for the detection of virulent and benign Dichelobacter nodosus, the causative agent of ovine footrot, in Australia.
    Best N; Zanandrez L; Gwozdz J; Klien E; Buller N; Suter R; Rawlin G; Beddoe T
    BMC Vet Res; 2018 Aug; 14(1):252. PubMed ID: 30157841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of elastase in the differentiation of Bacteroides nodosus infections in sheep and cattle.
    Stewart DJ
    Res Vet Sci; 1979 Jul; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 504813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved laboratory diagnosis of ovine footrot: an update.
    Liu D; Yong WK
    Vet J; 1997 Jan; 153(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 9125362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activities and partial purification of extracellular proteases of Bacteroides nodosus from virulent and benign footrot.
    Kortt AA; O'Donnell IJ; Stewart DJ; Clark BL
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1982; 35(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 6762194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of gelatin gel and elastase tests for detection of protease activity of Dichelobacter nodosus isolates from ovine footrot.
    Links IJ; Morris S
    Vet Microbiol; 1996 Aug; 51(3-4):305-18. PubMed ID: 8870192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proteinase isoenzyme patterns of Bacteroides nodosus: distinction between ovine virulent isolates, ovine benign isolates and bovine isolates.
    Every D
    J Gen Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 128(4):809-12. PubMed ID: 6750039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amplification of acidic protease virulence gene (aprV2) in samples from footrot lesions did not help in diagnosis of clinical virulent footrot in affected sheep flocks in New South Wales.
    Collins AM; Bowring BG
    Aust Vet J; 2020 Jul; 98(7):298-304. PubMed ID: 32215910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of prevalence, serological diversity, and virulence of Dichelobacter nodosus in ovine footrot with identification of its predominant serotype as a potential vaccine candidate in J&K, India.
    Wani SA; Farooq S; Kashoo ZA; Hussain I; Bhat MA; Rather MA; Aalamgeer S
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2019 Jun; 51(5):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 30627862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.