These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [What is the benefit of screening for breast cancer? Contra]. Schmidt JG Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S178-98. PubMed ID: 9133272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A quest for quality and economic effectiveness throughout the continuum of breast care. La Fargue MM; Coleman C Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 20392641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening in Norway]. Kåresen R; Bø JK; Haustveit S; Hervik A; Thoresen SO Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(24):3553-9. PubMed ID: 10563171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women. Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward effective application of efficacious cancer control interventions. Urban N; Thompson B; Pasket E Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():39-51. PubMed ID: 3118390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Supporting statements and rationale. Costanza ME; Annas GJ; Brown ML; Cassel CK; Champion V; Cohen HJ; Frame PS; Glasse L; Mor V; Pauker SG J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():7-16. PubMed ID: 1430887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Mammographic screening does not reduce breast cancer mortality]. Sjönell G; Ståhle L Lakartidningen; 1999 Feb; 96(8):904-5, 908-13. PubMed ID: 10089737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of health care, cost, and culture on breast cancer screening: issues facing urban American Indian women. Risendal B; Roe D; DeZapien J; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):501-9. PubMed ID: 10600431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening for breast cancer: is it globally applicable? Mittra I Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 18059392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Characteristics of underserved women who did and those who did not use a free/low-cost voucher as part of a mammography screening program. Dole GF; Carney PA J Cancer Educ; 1998; 13(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 9659629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening. Lee CH; Weinreb JC J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services. Facione NC Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma. Feig SA Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 12209736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer screening--right or wrong? Chamberlain J Trans Med Soc Lond; 1990-1991; 107():53-7. PubMed ID: 2152425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling. Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. Lisby MD Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]