118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 913368)
1. Duodenoscopic guided biopsy of the biliary and pancreatic duct.
Seifert E; Urakami Y; Elster K
Endoscopy; 1977 Aug; 9(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 913368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the bile duct, the pancreatic duct and the papilla of Vater.
Biesterfeld S; Deacu L
Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1579-84. PubMed ID: 19443369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Myren J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1975; 10(8):829-31. PubMed ID: 1202615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Endoscopy and biopsy of the pancreatic duct--a new method of pancreas diagnosis].
Stömmer P; Kraus J; Foerster EC; Domschke W
Leber Magen Darm; 1989 Dec; 19(6):311-8. PubMed ID: 2559271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ropeway-type bile duct biopsy forceps with a side slit for a guidewire.
Tamada K; Higashizawa T; Tomiyama T; Wada S; Ohashi A; Satoh Y; Ido K; Sugano K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jan; 53(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 11154498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of biliary tract lesions by histological sectioning of brush bristles as alternative to cytological smearing.
Asioli S; Accinelli G; Pacchioni D; Bussolati G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1274-81. PubMed ID: 18177458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical evaluation of preoperative biopsies of the pancreas].
Shamanov AKh; Goncharova LS; Rybus MIa; Chernikova VE
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1972 Apr; 108(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 4341824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnosis and morphological and functional significance of biliary-pancreatic and pancreatic-biliary reflux].
Roviera C; Bologna A
Minerva Med; 1972 Sep; 63(68):3689-703. PubMed ID: 5071958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intestinal brushing. Technical-cytological contribution in the pathological study of Vater's ampulla, common bile duct, and pancreatic system].
Villanacci V; Padova E; Bonardi M; Favret M; Ravelli P; Missale G; Cestari R
Pathologica; 1999 Dec; 91(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 10783641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endobiliary brush biopsy: Intra- and interobserver variation in cytological evaluation of brushings from bile duct strictures.
Adamsen S; Olsen M; Jendresen MB; Holck S; Glenthøj A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 41(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 16638704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous cholangiofiberscopic endoluminal forceps biopsy of intrabile duct diseases.
Hwang MH; Tsai CC; Chou CY; Mo LR; Yang CT; Lin RC; Yueh SK
Hepatogastroenterology; 1998; 45(24):2073-8. PubMed ID: 9951868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of peroral video-cholangioscopic visual findings and cholangioscopy-guided forceps biopsy findings for indeterminate biliary lesions: a prospective study.
Nishikawa T; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Sugiyama H; Miyazaki M; Yokosuka O
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Feb; 77(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 23231758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of the intramural extension of bile duct carcinoma.
Sato M; Inoue H; Ogawa S; Ohashi S; Maetani I; Igarashi Y; Sakai Y
Endoscopy; 1998 Mar; 30(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 9615877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.
Layfield LJ; Wax TD; Lee JG; Cotton PB
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7846997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
