These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9133854)

  • 1. Subnasal modified Le Fort I for nasolabial aesthetics improvement.
    Becelli R; De Ponte FS; Fadda MT; Govoni FA; Iannetti G
    J Craniofac Surg; 1996 Sep; 7(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 9133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two techniques of cinch suturing to avoid widening of the base of the nose after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Rauso R; Gherardini G; Santillo V; Biondi P; Santagata M; Tartaro G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):356-9. PubMed ID: 19740580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The stability of an alar cinch suture after Le Fort I and mandibular osteotomies in Japanese patients with Class III malocclusions.
    Shoji T; Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K; Tsuchida Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 50(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 21621313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective?
    Howley C; Ali N; Lee R; Cox S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 20304541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tip upturning and maxillary advancement: the UT angle.
    Tartaro G; Santagata M; Corzo L; Rauso R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1387-90. PubMed ID: 18812869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subnasal modified Le Fort I osteotomy: indications and results.
    Fernández Sanromán J; Costas López A; Fernández Ferro M; Arenaz Bua J; López de Sánchez A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 24525028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional evaluation of the alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    van Loon B; Verhamme L; Xi T; de Koning MJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1309-14. PubMed ID: 27269221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of alar base cinch suture based on anatomic landmarks on the morphology of nasolabial region in patients after orthognathic surgery].
    Zhang W; Liu XJ; Li ZL; Zhang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Aug; 55(4):736-742. PubMed ID: 37534660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective study on the effect of modified alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure versus simple closing sutures on nasolabial changes after Le Fort I intrusion and advancement osteotomies.
    Muradin MS; Seubring K; Stoelinga PJ; vd Bilt A; Koole R; Rosenberg AJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):870-6. PubMed ID: 20727648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of two alar base suture techniques suture techniques on nasolabial changes after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Taiwanese patients with class III malocclusions.
    Chen CY; Lin CC; Ko EW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):816-22. PubMed ID: 25825373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and stability of the alar base cinch suture.
    Stewart A; Edler RJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 49(8):623-6. PubMed ID: 21489664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of setback Le Fort I osteotomy on midfacial soft-tissue changes as evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography superimposition for cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lee JY; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Park SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 23294855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective assessment of maxillary advancement effects: maxillary incisor exposure, and upper lip and nasal changes.
    Khamashta-Ledezma L; Naini FB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):454-64. PubMed ID: 25836005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy in preventing postoperative nasal deformation.
    Yamashsita Y; Iwai T; Honda K; Fujita K; Imai H; Takasu H; Omura S; Hirota M; Mitsudo K
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jul; 73(7):1326-1330. PubMed ID: 32197886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Preliminary Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Aesthetics Following Le Fort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Davidson E; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):e629-33. PubMed ID: 26468849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure on soft tissue dynamics after Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies.
    Muradin MS; Rosenberg A; van der Bilt A; Stoelinga PJ; Koole R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 37(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 19477655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the Pyriform Ligament Important for Alar Width Maintenance After Le Fort I Osteotomy?
    Peacock ZS; Susarla SM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S57-66. PubMed ID: 26608155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nasal anatomy and maxillary surgery. II. Unfavorable nasolabial esthetics following the Le Fort I osteotomy.
    O'Ryan F; Schendel S
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1989; 4(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 2639920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nasolabial esthetics after Le Fort I osteotomy and V-Y closure: a statistical evaluation.
    Rosenberg A; Muradin MS; van der Bilt A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11934053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasolabial angle and orthognathic surgery.
    Garcia C; Olivi P
    Int Orthod; 2015 Mar; 13(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 25665905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.