These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9134736)

  • 1. Evolution of forelimb movement patterns for prey manipulation in anurans.
    Gray LA; O'Reilly JC; Nishikawa KC
    J Exp Zool; 1997 Apr; 277(6):417-24. PubMed ID: 9134736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of food properties on grasping and manipulation in the aquatic frog
    Anzeraey A; Aumont M; Decamps T; Herrel A; Pouydebat E
    J Exp Biol; 2017 Dec; 220(Pt 23):4486-4491. PubMed ID: 28982969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prey capture kinematics of horned frogs (Anura: Ceratophryidae).
    Duport-Bru AS; Abdala V
    J Morphol; 2024 Apr; 285(4):e21689. PubMed ID: 38549281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The kinematics and mechanism of prey capture in the African pig-nosed frog (Hemisus marmoratum): description of a radically divergent anuran tongue.
    Ritter D; Nishikawa K
    J Exp Biol; 1995 Sep; 198(Pt 9):2025-40. PubMed ID: 7595163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Movement patterns in leiopelmatid frogs: Insights into the locomotor repertoire of basal anurans.
    Reilly S; Essner R; Wren S; Easton L; Bishop PJ
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():43-53. PubMed ID: 26449314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Independent Evolution of Suction Feeding in Neobatrachia: Feeding Mechanisms in Two Species of Telmatobius (Anura:Telmatobiidae).
    Barrionuevo JS
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2016 Feb; 299(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 26575038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.
    Carreño CA; Nishikawa KC
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Jun; 213(Pt 12):2001-8. PubMed ID: 20511513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuromuscular control of prey capture in frogs.
    Nishikawa KC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1999 May; 354(1385):941-54. PubMed ID: 10382226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensory modulation and behavioral choice during feeding in the Australian frog, Cyclorana novaehollandiae.
    Valdez CM; Nishikawa KC
    J Comp Physiol A; 1997 Mar; 180(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 9048439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Turning into frogs: Asymmetry in forelimb emergence and escape direction in metamorphosing anurans.
    Zechini L; Lilley A; Waddell E; Burns TJ; Downie JR; Walsh PT
    Laterality; 2017 Nov; 22(6):641-653. PubMed ID: 27666522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti.
    Monroy JA; Nishikawa KC
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2009 Sep; 195(9):843-52. PubMed ID: 19657661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eating without hands or tongue: specialization, elaboration and the evolution of prey processing mechanisms in cartilaginous fishes.
    Dean MN; Wilga CD; Summers AP
    Biol Lett; 2005 Sep; 1(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 17148206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prey-type dependent hypoglossal feedback system in the frog Rana pipiens.
    Anderson CW; Nishikawa KC
    Brain Behav Evol; 1993; 42(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 8364717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Getting a grip on the evolution of grasping in musteloid carnivorans: a three-dimensional analysis of forelimb shape.
    Fabre AC; Cornette R; Slater G; Argot C; Peigné S; Goswami A; Pouydebat E
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jul; 26(7):1521-35. PubMed ID: 23662594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prey-catching behavior of anurans toward moving and stationary objects.
    Ingle DJ
    Vision Res; 1971; Suppl 3():447-56. PubMed ID: 5293885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the red spotted green frog Hypsiboas punctatus (Anura: Hylidae) selecting its preys? The importance of prey availability.
    López JA; Scarabotti PA; Medrano MC; Ghirardi R
    Rev Biol Trop; 2009 Sep; 57(3):847-57. PubMed ID: 19928476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skilled forelimb movements in prey catching and in reaching by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and opossums (Monodelphis domestica): relations to anatomical differences in motor systems.
    Ivanco TL; Pellis SM; Whishaw IQ
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Sep; 79(1-2):163-81. PubMed ID: 8883828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similar hand shaping in reaching-for-food (skilled reaching) in rats and humans provides evidence of homology in release, collection, and manipulation movements.
    Sacrey LA; Alaverdashvili M; Whishaw IQ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 204(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 19520119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landing in basal frogs: evidence of saltational patterns in the evolution of anuran locomotion.
    Essner RL; Suffian DJ; Bishop PJ; Reilly SM
    Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Oct; 97(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 20625697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for rodent-common and species-typical limb and digit use in eating, derived from a comparative analysis of ten rodent species.
    Whishaw IQ; Sarna JR; Pellis SM
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Nov; 96(1-2):79-91. PubMed ID: 9821545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.