117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9135316)
1. Validation of thoracic electrical bioimpedance as a porcine research tool.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Br J Anaesth; 1997 Mar; 78(3):323-5. PubMed ID: 9135316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output determinations in the pig--thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Jivegård L; Frid I; Haljamäe H; Holm J; Holm S; Wickström I
Crit Care Med; 1990 Sep; 18(9):995-8. PubMed ID: 2394124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure--noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution.
Castor G; Molter G; Helms J; Niedermark I; Altmayer P
Crit Care Med; 1990 May; 18(5):544-6. PubMed ID: 2183967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a new advanced thoracic bioimpedance device for estimation of cardiac output.
Haryadi DG; Westenskow DR; Critchley LA; Schookin SI; Zubenko VG; Beliaev KR; Morozov AA
J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Feb; 15(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 12578087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Banakal S; Gupta R; Sathyaprabha TN; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Jun; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 18418719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients.
Weiss S; Calloway E; Cairo J; Granger W; Winslow J
Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Nov; 13(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 7575799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Bhandopadhyaya A; Sathyaprabha TN; Janaki P; Mahalla BK; Gupta R; Banakal S; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 20229061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound.
Castor G; Klocke RK; Stoll M; Helms J; Niedermark I
Br J Anaesth; 1994 Jan; 72(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 8110539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.
Jewkes C; Sear JW; Verhoeff F; Sanders DJ; Foëx P
Br J Anaesth; 1991 Dec; 67(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 1768552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution in patients post open-heart surgery.
Zácek P; Kunes P; Kobzová E; Dominik J
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 1999; 42(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10566176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution.
Faini A; Omboni S; Tifrea M; Bubenek S; Lazar O; Parati G
Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac index and ejection fraction in ischemic heart disease. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance, thermodilution and cineventriculography].
Talarico G; Saino A; Lotto A
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1992 Jun; 40(6):203-9. PubMed ID: 1407614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac output measurement: lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settings.
Atallah MM; Demain AD
J Clin Anesth; 1995 May; 7(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 7669305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function.
Spinale FG; Smith AC; Crawford FA
Crit Care Med; 1990 Apr; 18(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2318052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
