109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9135653)
1. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Horsman A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 9135653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Coady AM; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 69(827):1009-16. PubMed ID: 8958017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Braunagel M; Radler E; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rist C; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25260094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.
Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne HE; Kvinnsland S; Haugen OA; Rinck PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 8061451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Drew PJ; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):516-26. PubMed ID: 9240704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):446-51. PubMed ID: 9227224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmentation strategies for breast tumors from dynamic MR images.
Lucas-Quesada FA; Sinha U; Sinha S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(5):753-63. PubMed ID: 8890013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma].
Hess T; Knopp MV; Hoffmann U; Brix G; Junkermann H; Zuna I; von Fournier D; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 8011997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: the impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters.
Craciunescu OI; Yoo DS; Cleland E; Muradyan N; Carroll MD; MacFall JR; Barboriak DP; Brizel DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e345-50. PubMed ID: 21985945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography.
Hoffmann U; Brix G; Knopp MV; Hess T; Lorenz WJ
Magn Reson Med; 1995 Apr; 33(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 7776881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Errors in quantitative dynamic three-dimensional keyhole MR imaging of the breast.
Plewes DB; Bishop J; Soutar I; Cohen E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 7633115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semiautomatic determination of arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Chung J; Kim JH; Lee EJ; Kim YN; Yi CA
Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 25369854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
