BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9136065)

  • 1. Using aspects of study design in sample size estimation.
    Phillips A; Campbell M
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 May; 7(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 9136065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e141-6. PubMed ID: 21967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.
    Julious SA
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1921-86. PubMed ID: 15195324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size and the probability of a successful trial.
    Chuang-Stein C
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 17128428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size re-estimation for adaptive sequential design in clinical trials.
    Gao P; Ware JH; Mehta C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1184-96. PubMed ID: 18991116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis.
    Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F;
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blinded sample size recalculation for clinical trials with normal data and baseline adjusted analysis.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19943322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stopping boundaries adjusted for sample size reestimation and negative stop.
    Shun Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):485-502. PubMed ID: 12477071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified large sample approach in the assessment of population bioequivalence.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 11104391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.
    Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Aspects of sample size determination and power calculation illustrated on examples from rehabilitation research].
    Kutschmann M; Bender R; Grouven U; Berg G
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2006 Dec; 45(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 17123220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of testing times and critical values in sequential equivalence testing.
    Müller HH; Schäfer H
    Stat Med; 1999 Jul; 18(14):1769-88; discussion 1789. PubMed ID: 10407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of information and optimal clinical trial design.
    Willan AR; Pinto EM
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1791-806. PubMed ID: 15806619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and sample size estimation in clinical trials with clustered survival times as the primary endpoint.
    Xie T; Waksman J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2835-46. PubMed ID: 12953283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size estimation for the van Elteren test--a stratified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Zhao YD
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2675-87. PubMed ID: 16372389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.