These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9137947)

  • 1. Is ownership more important than the scientific credibility of audit protocols? A survey of medical audit advisory groups.
    Baker R; Fraser RC
    Fam Pract; 1997 Apr; 14(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9137947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice.
    Hearnshaw H; Baker R; Cooper A; Eccles M; Soper J
    Fam Pract; 1996 Feb; 13(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 8671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing role of medical audit advisory groups.
    Humphrey C; Berrow D
    Qual Health Care; 1993 Dec; 2(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 10132457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From audit to effectiveness: an historical evaluation of the changing role of Medical Audit Advisory Groups.
    Houghton G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Nov; 3(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 9456424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.
    Baker R; Fraser R
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1993; 6(3):4-8. PubMed ID: 10131445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical guidelines in primary care: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes and behaviour.
    Siriwardena AN
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Dec; 45(401):643-7. PubMed ID: 8745861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice.
    Baker R; Hearnshaw H; Cooper A; Cheater F; Robertson N
    Qual Health Care; 1995 Dec; 4(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 10156391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of audit activity in general practice.
    Hearnshaw H; Baker R; Cooper A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Feb; 48(427):979-81. PubMed ID: 9624769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.
    Chambers R; Bowyer S; Campbell I
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Mar; 5(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 10157267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria.
    Fraser RC; Khunti K; Baker R; Lakhani M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Nov; 47(424):743-6. PubMed ID: 9519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are audits wasting resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review criteria.
    Hearnshaw HM; Harker RM; Cheater FM; Baker RH; Grimshaw GM
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Feb; 12(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12571341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to the organization of multi-practice audits in primary health care in the UK.
    Khunti K; Baker R; Rumsey M; Lakhani M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Jun; 11(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10435843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of care of patients with diabetes: collation of data from multi-practice audits of diabetes in primary care.
    Khunti K; Baker R; Rumsey M; Lakhani M
    Fam Pract; 1999 Feb; 16(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10321397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditing audits: use and development of the Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group rating system.
    Lawrence M; Griew K; Derry J; Anderson J; Humphreys J
    BMJ; 1994 Aug 20-27; 309(6953):513-6. PubMed ID: 8086911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths on clinical practice. Report of a postal survey of a sample of consultant anaesthetists.
    Derrington MC; Gallimore S
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Jan; 52(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 9014538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A natural survey of audit activity across the primary-secondary care interface.
    Eccles MP; Deverill M; McColl E; Richardson H
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Dec; 5(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 10164142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collation and comparison of multi-practice audit data: prevalence and treatment of known diabetes mellitus.
    Khunti K; Goyder E; Baker R
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 May; 49(442):375-9. PubMed ID: 10736888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical governance. Onus points.
    Malbon G; Gillam S; Mays N
    Health Serv J; 1998 Nov; 108(5631):28-9. PubMed ID: 10339195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.
    Johnston G; Crombie IK; Davies HT; Alder EM; Millard A
    Qual Health Care; 2000 Mar; 9(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 10848367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Hocking JS; Temple-Smith M; van Driel M; Law M; Guy R; Bulfone L; Wood A; Low N; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Kaldor J; Gunn J
    Implement Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27624835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.