These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9138334)

  • 21. Mechanical cardiac support in the young with the Berlin Heart EXCOR pulsatile ventricular assist device: 15 years' experience.
    Hetzer R; Alexi-Meskishvili V; Weng Y; Hübler M; Potapov E; Drews T; Hennig E; Kaufmann F; Stiller B
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu; 2006; ():99-108. PubMed ID: 16638554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mechanical circulatory support: 15 years of experience in the Heart Center North Rhine-Westphalia].
    Körfer R; El-Banayosy A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Apr; 129(15):800-4. PubMed ID: 15054685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center.
    Vecchio S; Chechi T; Giuliani G; Lilli A; Consoli L; Spaziani G; Giannotti F; Margheri M
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Aug; 56(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18614983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Percutaneous insertion of a left ventricular assist device for cardiogenic shock in a patient with a myocardial infarction].
    Ottervanger JP; de Feijter P; Gardien M; Serruys PW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jan; 147(4):164-6. PubMed ID: 12635549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age.
    Jurmann MJ; Weng Y; Drews T; Pasic M; Hennig E; Hetzer R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Apr; 25(4):610-8. PubMed ID: 15037280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improvement in survival after mechanical circulatory support with pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients.
    Hetzer R; Potapov EV; Stiller B; Weng Y; Hübler M; Lemmer J; Alexi-Meskishvili V; Redlin M; Merkle F; Kaufmann F; Hennig E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):917-24; discussion 924-5. PubMed ID: 16928509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reduced myocardial blood flow during left ventricular assist device support: a possible cause of premature bypass graft closure.
    Xydas S; Rosen RS; Pinney S; Hickey KT; Wasserman H; Mancini DM; Naka Y; Oz MC; Bergmann SR; Maybaum S
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1976-9. PubMed ID: 16297808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mechanical assistance in cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery].
    Kubrusly LF
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 63(3):251-4. PubMed ID: 7779001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.
    Long JW; Healy AH; Rasmusson BY; Cowley CG; Nelson KE; Kfoury AG; Clayson SE; Reid BB; Moore SA; Blank DU; Renlund DG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1353-60; discussion 1360-1. PubMed ID: 18544385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, for recovery from cardiomyopathy, and for permanent replacement.
    Loebe M; Hennig E; Müller J; Spiegelsberger S; Weng Y; Hetzer R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Apr; 11 Suppl():S18-24. PubMed ID: 9271176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Impella LP 5.0 as a bridge to long-term circulatory support.
    Samoukovic G; Rosu C; Giannetti N; Cecere R
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jun; 8(6):682-3. PubMed ID: 19254945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.
    Burkhoff D; Cohen H; Brunckhorst C; O'Neill WW;
    Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):469.e1-8. PubMed ID: 16923414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of a percutaneous ventricular assist device in decision making for a cardiac transplant program.
    Brinkman WT; Rosenthal JE; Eichhorn E; Dewey TM; Magee MJ; Savor DS; Riley AG; Prince SL; Worley CM; Herbert MA; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 88(5):1462-6. PubMed ID: 19853093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Levitronix ventricular assist device as a bridge-to-recovery for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.
    Clough RE; Vallely MP; Henein MY; Pepper JR
    Int J Cardiol; 2009 May; 134(3):408-9. PubMed ID: 18378019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Who would be a candidate for bridge to recovery during prolonged mechanical left ventricular support in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
    Matsumiya G; Monta O; Fukushima N; Sawa Y; Funatsu T; Toda K; Matsuda H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 130(3):699-704. PubMed ID: 16153916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Left ventricular assist devices decrease fixed pulmonary hypertension in cardiac transplant candidates.
    Zimpfer D; Zrunek P; Roethy W; Czerny M; Schima H; Huber L; Grimm M; Rajek A; Wolner E; Wieselthaler G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 17320566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcome evaluation of the bridge-to-bridge concept in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Hoefer D; Ruttmann E; Poelzl G; Kilo J; Hoermann C; Margreiter R; Laufer G; Antretter H
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Jul; 82(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 16798182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety and efficacy of left ventricular assist device support in postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.
    Leshnower BG; Gleason TG; O'Hara ML; Pochettino A; Woo YJ; Morris RJ; Gardner TJ; Acker MA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1365-70; discussion 1370-1. PubMed ID: 16564274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.
    Idelchik GM; Simpson L; Civitello AB; Loyalka P; Gregoric ID; Delgado R; Kar B
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Jan; 27(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 18187095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of timing right ventricular assist device withdrawal using left ventricular assist device filling characteristics.
    Mandarino WA; Winowich S; Gasior TA; Pham S; Griffith BP; Kormos RL
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M801-5. PubMed ID: 9360157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.