135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9138605)
1. Influence of investigator experience and microscopic field size on microvessel density in node-negative breast carcinoma.
Vermeulen PB; Libura M; Libura J; O'Neill PJ; van Dam P; Van Marck E; Van Oosterom AT; Dirix LY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Jan; 42(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 9138605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Rose C; Bak M; Sørensen FB
Lab Invest; 1998 Dec; 78(12):1563-73. PubMed ID: 9881956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of angiogenesis in lymph node metastases with outcome of breast cancer.
Guidi AJ; Berry DA; Broadwater G; Perloff M; Norton L; Barcos MP; Hayes DF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Mar; 92(6):486-92. PubMed ID: 10716967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma.
Weidner N; Folkman J; Pozza F; Bevilacqua P; Allred EN; Moore DH; Meli S; Gasparini G
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Dec; 84(24):1875-87. PubMed ID: 1281237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of microvessel density in lymph node negative breast carcinoma.
Costello P; McCann A; Carney DN; Dervan PA
Hum Pathol; 1995 Nov; 26(11):1181-4. PubMed ID: 7590689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microvessels that predict axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Nathanson SD; Zarbo RJ; Wachna DL; Spence CA; Andrzejewski TA; Abrams J
Arch Surg; 2000 May; 135(5):586-93; discussion 593-4. PubMed ID: 10807285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma.
Gasparini G; Weidner N; Bevilacqua P; Maluta S; Dalla Palma P; Caffo O; Barbareschi M; Boracchi P; Marubini E; Pozza F
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Mar; 12(3):454-66. PubMed ID: 7509851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count.
Dhakal HP; Bassarova A; Naume B; Synnestvedt M; Borgen E; Kaaresen R; Schlichting E; Wiedswang G; Giercksky KE; Nesland JM
Histol Histopathol; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1049-59. PubMed ID: 19554512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Angiogenesis as a predictor of long-term survival for patients with node-negative breast cancer.
Heimann R; Ferguson D; Powers C; Recant WM; Weichselbaum RR; Hellman S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Dec; 88(23):1764-9. PubMed ID: 8944007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of intratumoral microvessel density, a measure of tumor angiogenesis, in node-negative breast carcinoma--results of a multiparametric study.
Bevilacqua P; Barbareschi M; Verderio P; Boracchi P; Caffo O; Dalla Palma P; Meli S; Weidner N; Gasparini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1995; 36(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 8534868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor angiogenesis predicts clinical outcome of node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy.
Gasparini G; Barbareschi M; Boracchi P; Verderio P; Caffo O; Meli S; Dalla Palma P; Marubini E; Bevilacqua P
Cancer J Sci Am; 1995; 1(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 9166466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitation of microvessel density in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by computer-aided image analysis.
Erovic BM; Neuchrist C; Berger U; El-Rabadi K; Burian M
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Jan; 117(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 15986592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma.
Bosari S; Lee AK; DeLellis RA; Wiley BD; Heatley GJ; Silverman ML
Hum Pathol; 1992 Jul; 23(7):755-61. PubMed ID: 1377162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumour angiogenesis as a prognostic marker in infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Morphopoulos G; Pearson M; Ryder WD; Howell A; Harris M
J Pathol; 1996 Sep; 180(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 8943814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of tumor angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinomas: absence of correlation with prognosis and pathological factors.
Fridman V; Humblet C; Bonjean K; Boniver J
Virchows Arch; 2000 Dec; 437(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 11193472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic assay for invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Axelsson K; Ljung BM; Moore DH; Thor AD; Chew KL; Edgerton SM; Smith HS; Mayall BH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Jul; 87(13):997-1008. PubMed ID: 7543156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microvessel density counting in breast cancer. Slides vs. digital images.
Cruz D; Valentà C; Dias A; Seixas M; Schmitt F
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11233738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microvessel density in breast cancer: the impact of field area on prognostic informativeness.
Kraby MR; Opdahl S; Russnes HG; Bofin AM
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Apr; 72(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30630872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinoma--a prospective study of tumour heterogeneity.
Ahlgren J; Risberg B; Villman K; Bergh J
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Jan; 38(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11750841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.
Fox SB; Leek RD; Weekes MP; Whitehouse RM; Gatter KC; Harris AL
J Pathol; 1995 Nov; 177(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 8551390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
