200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9139177)
1. Metabolic efficiency during arm and leg exercise at the same relative intensities.
Kang J; Robertson RJ; Goss FL; Dasilva SG; Suminski RR; Utter AC; Zoeller RF; Metz KF
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Mar; 29(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 9139177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physiological responses to upper body exercise on an arm and a modified leg ergometer.
Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Angelucci J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Oct; 31(10):1453-9. PubMed ID: 10527319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiorespiratory and efficiency responses during arm and leg exercises with spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates.
Marais G; Dupont L; Maillet M; Weissland T; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Ergonomics; 2002 Jul; 45(9):631-9. PubMed ID: 12217084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants.
Baumgart JK; Gürtler L; Ettema G; Sandbakk Ø
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Sep; 118(9):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 29936549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of prior arm exercise on pulmonary gas exchange kinetics during high-intensity leg exercise in humans.
Bohnert B; Ward SA; Whipp BJ
Exp Physiol; 1998 Jul; 83(4):557-70. PubMed ID: 9717077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metabolic and perceptual responses during arm and leg ergometry in water and air.
Robertson R; Goss F; Michael T; Moyna N; Gordon P; Visich P; Kang J; Angelopoulos T; Dasilva S; Metz K
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 May; 27(5):760-4. PubMed ID: 7674882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of crank rate on physiological responses and exercise efficiency using a range of submaximal workloads during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 27(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 16541375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry.
Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A
J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise.
Price MJ; Campbell IG
Int J Sports Med; 1999 Oct; 20(7):457-63. PubMed ID: 10551341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry.
Hill M; Talbot C; Puddiford M; Price M
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 May; 118(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29511919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exercise efficiency during arm ergometry: effects of speed and work rate.
Powers SK; Beadle RE; Mangum M
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol; 1984 Feb; 56(2):495-9. PubMed ID: 6706760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic, thermoregulatory, and psychophysiological responses during arm and leg exercise.
Pivarnik JM; Grafner TR; Elkins ES
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Feb; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3343911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of previous dynamic arm exercise on power output during repeated maximal sprint cycling.
Bogdanis GC; Nevill ME; Lakomy HK
J Sports Sci; 1994 Aug; 12(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 7932946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RPE responses during arm and leg exercises: effect of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate.
Marais G; Dupont L; Garcin M; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Feb; 92(1):253-62. PubMed ID: 11322592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spontaneously chosen crank rate variations in submaximal arm exercise with inexperienced subjects. Effects on cardiorespiratory and efficiency parameters.
Marais G; Dupont L; Maillet M; Weissland T; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Int J Sports Med; 2002 Feb; 23(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11842359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No gender-specific differences in mechanical efficiency during arm or leg exercise relative to ventilatory threshold.
Yasuda N; Gaskill SE; Ruby BC
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2008 Apr; 18(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 17490463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of body mass on exercise efficiency and VO2 during steady-state cycling.
Berry MJ; Storsteen JA; Woodard CM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Sep; 25(9):1031-7. PubMed ID: 8231771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responses to arm and leg ergometry.
Eston RG; Brodie DA
Br J Sports Med; 1986 Mar; 20(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 3697603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiorespiratory responses to exercise distributed between the upper and lower body.
Toner MM; Sawka MN; Levine L; Pandolf KB
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol; 1983 May; 54(5):1403-7. PubMed ID: 6863099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
